My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02551
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02551
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
8/11/1965
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />l-lR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />l'lR. SPARRS: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />Nil.. ECKLES: <br /> <br />l-lR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />f.lR. ECla.ES: <br /> <br />"The All American is a part of . <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />"l"1hat's the name of the dam down there?" <br /> <br />"Oh, Bridge Canyon." <br /> <br />"Bridge Canyon. That ought to keep <br />somebody working for a fe\-1 years. But I <br />think we ought to have our congressional dele- <br />gation tell us the first alternative is <br />impossible. It is their responsibility. I <br />don't think. we can ma]ce political judgments <br />for them. I think it's their responsibility, <br />if vie think it I S done, to advocate that posi- <br />tion to the best of their ability and if, in <br />negotiations, they find it is infeasible then <br />I think we can then discuss retreating. But <br />I don't think. for this Board to give away a <br />substantial part of our technical position <br />which, I think, we are entitled to before we <br />even get into a contest, is giving much too <br />much away at this initial juncture. If the <br />congressional delegation will come to this <br />Board and say it is impossible, you are not <br />political realists, I'd take another look at <br />it. Until they said that I don't believe we <br />should give as much away as this bill indi- <br />cates because we are going to be compromising <br />from here on out. Ne are all lawyers, or <br />would-be lawyers or something like that, and <br />this is just a compromise situation and I <br />don't think we should at any time deviate <br />from a position that we want water from the <br />Columbia River Basin if that's where it <br />should come from, before we go ahead \17ith the <br />Central Arizona Project." <br /> <br />"I have one question, Hr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"Nr. Eckles." <br /> <br />"Hr. Chairman, the question that comes <br />to my mind, the way I read the central Ari- <br />zona Project, that ~2rble and Bridge Projects <br />are more or less the heart, or the guts, of the <br />payoff as far as the central Arizona is con- <br />cerned. Now, the special interest groups <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.