My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02537
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:17:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/17/1958
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1.l.24 <br /> <br />appears that higher educational and <br />experience standards are imposed by <br />Colorado than in the other states, as <br />a condition of employment. In respect <br />to available personnel, both legal and <br />engineering, Colorado is deficient in <br />comparison with the States of Utah and <br />New Mexico, and somewhat better staffed <br />than Wyoming. However, again, in cer- <br />tain areas, even in comparison with <br />Wyoming, Colorado appears to be defi- <br />cient. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The deficiency in staff in the <br />State of Colorado, compared with Utah <br />and New Mexico, exists in respect to <br />legal personnel available to the water <br />agencies. Of course, this situation is <br />compounded when comparison is made on <br />a per capita basis, and very much com- <br />pounded when comparison is made on the <br />basis of a complexity of the problems <br />dealt with. <br /> <br />Although a complete tabulation will <br />have to be made, it appears to be quite <br />clear that, with the possible exception <br />of Wyoming, Colorado expends on water <br />matters a fraction of that expended by <br />the other states on a per capita basis. <br />Again, though complete analysis has not <br />been made, it appears that the dispropor- <br />tionate per capita expenditures which <br />existed some years ago has been further <br />amplified. The most glaring example of <br />comparative weakness, as measured by <br />monies eXpended, is with the State of <br />New Mexico. Again, without complete <br />tabulation, it is interesting to note <br />that the State of New Mexico has avail- <br />able for the various aspects of its <br />responsibilities, approximately 30 pro- <br />fessional engineers and geologists, one <br />consulting engineer, plus consulting <br />engineers for specific matters when re- <br />quired, three full-time lawyers, and <br />two consulting attorneys whose total <br />compensation would appear to be approxi- <br />mately equal to that of the attorney <br />for this Board. When we bear in mind <br />that New Mexico has a population in the <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.