Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />l~lJ <br /> <br />The minutes of July 18th are approved with <br />whatever additional changes are submitted <br />to the Director's office. <br /> <br />Now turn to the minutes of September <br />17th, 1958. Are there any corrections or <br />additions to these minutes?" <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman I think I contacted the <br />office in connection with a correction on the <br />September 17th minutes. Do you have that <br />Larry?" <br /> <br />"Yes. M~. Peterson called our attention <br />to the fact that when Mr. Larson completed his <br />report to us in that meeting of September 17th <br />he handed us his written report and then he <br />stated at the conclusion that he was certain <br />that the Secretary of the Interior would find <br />that the Curecanti two dam project would be a <br />feasible project and I think Mr. Peterson asked <br />him again if that was correct, that that was a <br />feasible project, and Mr. Larson stated that it <br />was. <br /> <br />Now we did not include that in the minutes <br />because, if you will recall, Mr. Larson speci- <br />fically asked us not to. He submitted to us <br />his written report which he wanted put in the <br />record but no more. The basis for his request <br />is that it is not within his province or author- <br />ity to certify that any project is feasible. <br />That decision rests solely with the Secretary <br />of the Interior and Mr. Larson did not wish to <br />have anything in our records to show that he had <br />approved it in advance. I think we should play <br />along with him on that. He stated to us frankly <br />and it was put into the newspapers that he COn- <br />sidered it was a feasible project and that the <br />Secretary was so going to state. Nevertheless, <br />the Bureau works under certain channels of pro- <br />cedure and as long as it appeared in the news- <br />papers we can say he said it but it doesn't ap- <br />pear in our minutes and for that purpose very <br />often these people who make reports will ask us <br />that matters be kept off our official minutes <br />and that was the sole reason we omitted it." <br />