My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02497
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02497
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/14/1971
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I/C...J../C. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. BERTHELSON: <br /> <br />MR. BORGER: <br /> <br />Chatfield Dam. And to say that because we are <br />getting the thousand or so acres at Chatfield <br />Dam we don I t need any more parks, I think is <br />self defeating. As was indicated by the Mayor, <br />with our increasing population growth we have 'I <br />to have parks for the people where the people <br />are. In saying we have got Chatfield Dam, that <br />is enough, leave it alone, is to ignore the <br />people of our community." <br /> <br />"Larry, you are going to get a question <br />from somebody that lives in one of the beautiful <br />parts of Colorado. Si Berthelson." <br /> <br />"I have some second thoughts about building <br />a public park on a flood plain from a human risk <br />element standpoint. I am not sure that we should <br />have a park there and get old people down there <br />in wheel chairs. and so forth. There is always <br />an element of risk involved. I would think that <br />BUD and the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation would <br />have second thoughts about it. And perhaps the <br />City of Littleton." <br /> <br />"I appreciate your point. I am not sure I <br />agree with it because I think you run the risk <br />of people in wheel chairs falling in Chatfield <br />Dam for that matter. <br /> <br />The nature of the floods that you have or <br />that you would have, particularly with the fact <br />that the flood is going to be caused by the <br />release through the dam there should be a pretty <br />good chance or at least hours when there is <br />ample warning that there is going to be any <br />flooding in this area. <br /> <br />In the flood of 1965 for example. the City I <br />of Littleton evacuated a number of areas adja- <br />cent to the river saying, 'the state highway <br />department has told us that the flood is going <br />to be here in fifteen minutes.' That was when <br />it was in Castle Rock. We were then in the <br />awkward position of waiting three and a half <br />hours until the flood finally got there after <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.