My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02425
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02425
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:15:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
10/31/1957
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~u~ <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"This brings up a previous problem <br />on which I will confess I don't quite see <br />eye to eye with a great many of you. We <br />are a policy making group. We should see <br />which projects we want to push first, get <br />those projects' studies made and definite <br />plan reports completed so that they will <br />be ready to go to the Bureau of the Bud- <br />get and then turn them over to those whose <br />responsibility it is to get the money. <br /> <br />I don't think it is the function of <br />this Board to determine the amounts that <br />should be requested from Congress each <br />year." <br /> <br />Governor McNichols made his entrance and was brought <br />up to date on what the meeting had covered up to this time by <br />Vice-Chairman Moses. <br /> <br />MR. McCANDLESS: <br /> <br />'~ho would make this determination on <br />the amount of appropriations if the Board <br />doesn't?" <br /> <br />Mr. Moses said it was his thought that when the <br />Board wanted to push a project, they would give it a number <br />one priority, get the approximate costs and then give it to <br />our Congressmen and Senators who would determine, along with <br />the Bureau of Reclamation, how much we can spend. J~r. Peter- <br />son declared that we were not taking a large enough view of <br />this. <br /> <br />GOV. McNICHOLS: <br /> <br />'~hat about the Curecanti, has any- <br />thing been decided on that yet?" <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />''We are to have Mr. Larson's report on <br />that now." <br /> <br />Mr. Larson then asked Mr. Holmes to pass out to each <br />member a copy of his letter to Mr. Crawford and a map and chart <br />of the proposed Curecanti project. Mr. Peterson asked about <br />whether or not the Bureau of Reclamation, on their investiga- <br />tions of Colorado's rivers, took into consideration individual <br />projects. That in looking at the overall river, there were <br />spots not being taken into consideration. Mr. Larson replied <br />that generally speaking the Bureau was taking the overall river <br />into consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Larson read the following letter: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.