My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02402
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02402
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:10 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1998
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Basin Issues - Sonny Bono Memorial Salton Sea Bill
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />May 11-12, 1998 <br />Agenda Item 26j <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />Hearings on H.R 3267 were held on March 12, 1998 in the House Committee on Resources, <br />Subcommittee on Water and Power. Testimony was provided by among others: Wayne Cook, from <br />the Upper Colorado River Commission; Rita Pearson, from the Arizona Dept. Of Water Resources; <br />Ted Stewart, from the Utah Dept. Of Natural Resources; and Douglas Wheeler, Califomia Secretary <br />of Resources. Much of the testimony focused on Law of the River concerns as well as the expedited <br />time lines for study, environmental compliance, and implementation. Following the hearing H.R <br />3267 was reported to the full Committee, apparently with recognition of the need for amendment to <br />meet the near unanimous concerns expressed. The 105th Congress is scheduled to adjourn in early <br />October, and prospects for enactment oflegislation to reclaim the Salton Sea would appear meager. <br />However, there is an effort underway to introduce an amendment to H.R 3267 dealing with Law of <br />the River and Colorado River water use issues, and bring the Bill to the House floor this summer. <br />Whether that effort will be successful and whether the offered amendments would address all of the <br />Basin States' concerns is unclear at this time. Reportedly there is little interest in passing a bill in <br />the Senate. Wayne Cook of the Upper Colorado River Commission has informed staff that he is <br />tracking the status of this legislation and will inform the Upper Basin states if the Bill moves ahead <br />and if they need to take action through their Congressional delegations. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The Board may want to allow the Director, acting in coordination with the Upper Colorado River <br />Commission, is authority to comment as necessary and appropriate if either of the Bills advance <br />during the current Congressional term. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.