My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02400
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02400
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/27/1999
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Long-Term Funding Legislation
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PETER H. EVANS, ACTING DIRECTOR <br />DECEMBER 16, 1998 <br />PAGE 2 <br /> <br />The River District's Board now urges the CWCB to withdraw all of these claims. The Fish <br />& Wildlife Service has withdrawn support for the Colorado River claims, having determined that <br />those rights would not assist recovery and delisting. Without the support of the Service, it is now <br />untenable for the CWCB to prosecute those claims. The Service's reasoning about the Colorado <br />River claims certainly will apply with equal force to the Yampa River claims, which are modeled <br />on the same concepts that the Service has rejected on the Colorado River and which also face <br />significant opposition. <br /> <br />For the Colorado River, the Service now is advocating river management involving the <br />delivery of storage water to the "15-Mile" reach as a near-term strategy to provide endangered fish <br />flows. The discussions about the Yampa River have a similar focus. Provision and protection of <br />habitat necessary for delisting is a longer-term concern. Indeed, the Fish. & Wildlife Service's <br />"withdrawal of support" for the IS-Mile Reach claims refers to the need for instream flows to protect <br />habitat in order to support "delisting" of the species, an unscheduled event. <br /> <br />From a practical standpoint, it is very unlikely that the Water Courts would allow these <br />claims to be maintained in "suspended animation." The CWCB will not be able to maintain the <br />Yampa River claims "on hold" pending the completion of a multi-year "NEP A" process, the primary <br />rationale offered by those who suggest that it is premature to withdraw the Y ampa River claims. On <br />the Colorado River, the maintenance of the pending claims would impede the successful completion <br />of the anticipated "programmatic biological opinion" for the 15-Mile Reach. <br /> <br />As stated in my June 26, 1998 letter to you, the River District Board believes that flows for <br />the endangered fish should be based upon sound science and should be provided under state law. <br />If the CWCB withdraws its pending claims, the CWCB should carefully articulate the reasons for <br />that withdrawal. The State's novel claims, particularly the recovery flow claims, have been opposed <br />because they do not meet traditional standards for proof of need and beneficial use. The <br />unacceptability of the pending claims originates for many water users in the uncertainty concerning <br />the endangered fish species' flow needs. Conditions on the recovery flow claims were never <br />developed because of the Service's resistance to negotiating concepts that could have managed the <br />scientific and Compact development uncertainties within the constraints of Colorado law by <br />providing for "reality checks" on the species' flow needs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.