My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02386
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02386
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:04 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/8/1972
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. VANDEMOER: <br /> <br /> MR. VELEHRADSKY: <br />I MR. VANDEMOER: <br />MR. VELEHRADSKY : <br /> MR. VANDEMOER: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, MR. VELEHRADSKY: <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: <br /> <br />MR. VELEHRADSKY: <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: <br /> <br />MR. VELEHRADSKY: <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: <br /> <br />MR. VELEHRADSKY: <br /> <br />"But it would reduce it some if you have <br />that dam up river catching there." <br /> <br />"Probably about 15 percent." <br /> <br />"Is that all?" <br /> <br />"Fifteen thousand acre-feet, in that range." <br /> <br />"And then the other thing. Narrows of <br />course, like everything else, has gone up and <br />down and around. I know it is authorized and <br />set to go. Do they contemplate that channel- <br />ization in the Bureau's plans now, or didn't <br />they go ahead with no channelization?" <br /> <br />"No, it is not in the plans. Mr. Droskin <br />from the Bureau is here." <br /> <br />"I thought they went ahead without it, <br />didn't they?" <br /> <br />"Without, yes." <br /> <br />"Well then, if you go to where you are <br />thinking now, is there any chance of holding <br />up, or delaying, or changing the plan as it <br />stands for the Narrows now?" <br /> <br />"The only problem we are going to have <br />with the channelization is with the Secretary <br />of the Army's office and the Office of Manage- <br />ment and Budget, because I have a feeling that <br />the reviewers in those offices are going to <br />want to know what the least costly alternatives <br />are. They are going to want some studies to <br />show that the reservoirs are as good or better <br />than the channelization." <br /> <br />"I would hate after all these years to <br />hold up the Narrows any longer. I would rather <br />go ahead and let it get started and let thi~ <br />thing come later." <br /> <br />"I would like to address a question to <br /> <br />-11'- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.