Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Steve Sims, AG's staff. Lochhead amended his motion, which was seconded by Eisel, <br />to include consultation with the AG. The amended motion passed by unanimous ( - <br />0) decision. <br /> <br />7abcdf. Floodplain Management Issues, Floodplain Resolutions No. 92-323, 92-326, <br />92-327,92-328, and 92.330. (11:30 - 11:33 a.m.) <br /> <br />a. Flood Insurance Study, Town of Dolores, Colorado, by FEMA, dated <br />September 29, 1989; Floodplain Resolution No. 92-323 <br /> <br />b. Flood Plain Management Study, Pawnee Creek in Logan County, Colorado, <br />by USDA-Soil Conservation Service, dated April 1992; Floodplain Resolution <br />No. 92-326 <br /> <br />c. Flood Insurance Study, Adams County, Colorado (Unincorporated Areas) by <br />FEMA, dated December 15, 1989; Floodplain Resolution No. 92-327 <br /> <br />d. Flood Insurance Study, City of Co=erce City, Colorado, by FEMA, dated <br />September 30, 1988; Floodplain Resolution No. 92-328 <br /> <br />f. <br /> <br />Flood Insurance Study, Mesa County, Colorado (Unincorporated Areas) by <br />FEMA, dated July 15, 1992; Floodplain Resolution No. 92-330 <br /> <br />Larry Lang, CWCB staff, commented on the floodplain information at Dolores and <br />reco=ended the floodplain resolutions be handled in two groups. Floodplain <br />Resolution 92-332 was tabled. A motion was made by Harrison and seconded by <br />Eisel to adopt Floodplain Resolutions 92-323, 92-326, 92-327, 92-328, and 92-330. <br />The motion passed by unanimous (8-0) decision. <br /> <br />7eg. Floodplain Management Issues, Floodplain Resolutions No. 92-329 and 92-331,* <br />continued (11:33 - 11:34 a.m.) <br /> <br />e. Flood Insurance Study, City of Co=erce City, Colorado, by FEMA, dated <br />December 5, 1989; Floodplain Resolution No. 92-329 <br /> <br />g. Flood Insurance Study, City of Grand Junction, Colorado, by FEMA, dated <br />July IS, 1992; Floodplain Resolution No. 92-331 <br /> <br />A motion was made by Harrison and seconded by Eisel to adopt Floodplain <br />Resolutions 92-329 and 92-331. The motion passed by unanimous (8-0) decision. <br /> <br />Sept. 1992 Meeting, page 9 <br />