My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02359
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/15/1992
Description
Minutes only. Partial.
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7i. Floodplain Management Issues, Grand Junction Flood Control Levee System on the e <br />Colorado River Presentation,. continued (11:34 - 11:38 am.) <br /> <br />Chuck Lile thanked Larry Lang for arranging the tour of the Colorado River <br />Redevelopment Project wi.th the City of Grand Junction and Mesa County. <br />Lochhead and Harrison discussed the need for flood control compared with the goals <br />of the Fish and Wildlife Service, such as providing enough room for natural channel <br />migration in the IS-mile reach. <br /> <br />17a. Instream Flow Program: Preliminary Notice, Water Division 4; Saguache, Gunnison, <br />Hinsdale, and San Miguel Counties. (11:38 - 11:43 am.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman, CWCB staff, reviewed the status since the last meeting and asked the <br />Board to advance and allow staff to continue to develop final recommendations. <br />Questions were asked by Martineau and ShefteL A motion was made by Lochhead <br />and seconded by Smith to advance to final notice. The motion passed unanimously <br />(8-0). <br /> <br />. 18b. Instream Flow Program: Final Notice, Water Division 6; Routt, Moffat and Rio <br />Bianco Counties. (11:43 - 11:48 am.) <br /> <br />Dan Merriman reviewed the staff recommendation. Questions were asked by Smith <br />who moved to adopt the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by <br />. Harrison, and it passed unanimously (8-0). <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />29a. Instream Flow Program: Statements of Opposition, Case No. 1-92CW051; Twelve <br />Mile Fishing Club. (11:48 - 11:50 p.m.) . <br /> <br />Harrison disclosed his firm is a co-objector in the case but saw no conflict and <br />decided to participate. A motion was made by Harrison and seconded by Lochhead <br />to approve the staff recommendation. The motion passed by unanimous (8-0) <br />decision. <br /> <br />29b. Instream Flow Program: Statements of Opposition, Case No. 1-92CW059; City of <br />Blackhawk. (11:50 - 11:52 p.m.) <br /> <br />A motion was made by Harrison and seconded by Lochhead to approve the staff <br />recommendation. The motion passed by unanimous (8-0) decision. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Sept. 1992 Meeting, page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.