My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02326
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:38 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/17/1946
Description
Table of Contents and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ 7 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />At this point Director Stone called attention to the 8Il ount <br />authorized each year by the Board for payment to the National Reclamation <br />Association for its services in Washington on behalf of Colorado water <br />development. It was explained that Colorado's quota of the budget of the <br />National Reclamatio~ Association for the present year had been increased <br />from $2,uOO to' $2,775. He said that in his judgment it would not be <br />necessary for the Board to increase the amount. of its usual payment <br />toward this budget, as, in his judgment, it would be possible to obtain <br />the increased amount from various irrigation and conservancy districts over <br />the State. <br /> <br />It was moved by Director Stone and seconded by Mr. Dille <br />that the Board authorize the payment of $800.00 to the National <br />Reolamation Association for its services in behalf of the State, <br />such amount to apply on Colorado's share of the budget of that <br />Association for the present year. <br /> <br />The motion was unanimousiy carried and declared adopted. <br /> <br />Thereupon it was moved by Mr. Bailey and seconded by <br />Mr. Smith that the COIT~ittee heretofore appointed to appraise <br />obligations placed upon Colorado and. see that the necessary <br />engineering investigations and surveya are m~de in connection <br />therewith, under the Supreme Court decision in the North Platte River <br />case,. be continued with power to act. <br /> <br />The motion was unanimously carried and declared passed. <br /> <br />The Director then explained certain budgetary problema in connection <br />with the Board' II work. He stat<ld that the compact negotiations pending on <br />the Arkansas River had entailed the expenditures of considerable sums of <br />money which were not provided for under the item cf "Professional Services" in <br />the appropriation oill made by the Colorado Legislature. He emphasized that <br />in order to carry out this compact work and, if the other work of the Board <br />was not to be adversely affected, it would be necessary eitber to transfer <br />funds from the "Blanket Fund" to the. "Professional Fund" or to make arrange- <br />ments, with the approval of the Governor, the State Budget and Efficiency <br />Commissioner and the Attorney General's office for the payment of the <br />salaries of compact commissioners and their expenses out of the "Blanket <br />Fund". <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It wasmovea by Mr. Bailey and seconded by Mr. Smith that the <br />Director be authorized and directed to consult with tho Governor, <br />the Budget and Efficiency Commissioner and the Attorney General's <br />office for the purpose of making an adjustment of the Board'& budget <br />in order that the salaries and expenses of the commissioMers, may be <br />paid' out of the Blanket Fund or that an amount be transferred from <br />that fund to the Professional Services item of the Appropriat~on~Bill. <br />~. ." ;<.;.- <br />.z ~ . . .. _ -- <br />Thereupon the Director submitted for consideration of~~he Board'~he: <br />placing of Royce J. Tipton, Consulting Engineer for th~~Colorado Water.' , <br />Conservation Board, on an annual retainer rather than ~~a per-diem basis. <br />of payment for his services. Heretofore he had been p~dby. the Board: . <br />$30.00 a day for the work actually performed on behalf ~t~the Board. It; <br />was explained that the present arrangements had proven Uh~isfactory to <br />Mr. Tipton as well ss to the Board. It was further expl~ed that. shortly <br />- . . <br />--- <br />--.'~I'" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.