My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 12/03/1981
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
Board Meeting 12/03/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:13:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/3/1981
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />repayment conditions including extending the repayment period <br />beyond 40 years, a due on sale clause, accelerated repayment <br />schedules, collateralization through ewCB holding water rights, <br />and state purchase of project expansion beyond sponsor needs, <br />The motion carried on a unanimous voice vote, <br /> <br />Mr, Pascoe commented on item 7d. He pointed out that the <br />Board should forward its recommendations under a broad call <br />title. He called attention to a request for deauthorization from <br />the Denver Board of Water Commissioners concerning the $5 million <br />authorized by the legislature in 1978. The project was origin- <br />ated by the legislature, not by the Board, so no recommendation <br />on the issue was offered by the Board, (See Appendices C-1 & C-2.) <br />Mr. Johnston moved that the Board's actions be transmitted to the <br />General Assembly and that the request of the Denver Water <br />Commissioners be included without comment. Seconded by <br />Mr. Kroeger. The motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />The Board considered item 10a next, Mr. Johnston moved <br />approval of that portion of the feasibility study concerning Boss <br />Lake and to deny the portion dealing with analysis of use of <br />alluvial supplies. Seconded by Mr. Pascoe, <br /> <br />Mr, Danielson questioned whether or not the funding might be <br />better spent on a water rights analysis. Mr, Montgomery pointed <br />out that a suit is pending which clouds the project. The <br />sponsor's representative then expressed willingness to withdraw <br />the request. With the agreement of his second, Mr. Johnston then <br />withdrew the motion, He then moved that the matter be deferred <br />to the February meeting. Seconded by Mr. Getz and carried by a <br />unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />The Board considered the status of the South Platte River <br />Basin Assessment, agenda item 13, next. Mr. Walker summarized <br />the memorandum prepared by Mr. McDonald containing recommenda- <br />tions for completion of the project. (See Appendix D.) Mr, <br />Vandemoer moved that the recommendations be adopted as guidance <br />for completion of the assessment, Seconded by Mr. Getz. The <br />motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />Mr, Walker addressed agenda item 15 as an information item <br />and suggested that since federal legislative and executive <br />intention are unclear at the time, that further consideration be <br />given the matter in February when future directives are likely to <br />be clearer. <br /> <br />Mr, Pascoe introduced agenda item 16 by reporting that Mr, <br />Montgomery has done superb work in the interstate negotiations <br />and that the 1981 review represents a position acceptable to <br />Colorado. Under the proposal, present criteria on the Lower <br />Colorado River first established in 1972 would continue. (See <br />Appendix E.) Mr. Pascoe moved that the two recommendations in <br /> <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.