Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />One point as far as irrigation agriculture <br />is concerned deals with something that we don't <br />know too much about as yet and we are working on <br />it. This deals with the efficiency of water <br />used in relation to the actual amount of produc- <br />tion we can obtain per unit of water that is <br />actually used and transpired, or consumed in <br />other words, b}" the plant. We have :bad a <br />tendency in the past to attempt to develop <br />maximum yields. Perhaps where we have limited <br />water supplies or where water is sufficiently <br />expensive, we should not be shooting for maxi- <br />mum yields but should rather be shooting for <br />maximum production per unit of water. There is <br />a possibility, we think, in growing a crop where <br />we do not obtain maximum production but where, <br />by having somewhat less than maximum, we can <br />get a considerably greater production per unit <br />of water consumed. This involves such things <br />as causing that plant to be under some stress <br />conditions during certain stages of its develOp- <br />ment. We don't know very much about this as <br />yet. We are working on it. <br /> <br />Along with this type of study then, we <br />have become well involved with such things as <br />transpiration from plants, evaporation from <br />water surfaces, transport of water through the <br />soil, into the soil and through the soil by <br />unsaturated conductivity as we call it. We <br />have been interested, of course, to a great <br />extent with various factors that cause evapora- <br />tion losses from the soil surface as well as <br />those evaporation losses from the plant tissues <br />or the plant leaves. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Under dry-land conditions we have known <br />for years that summer fallowing is a type of <br />water conservation practice. It has been <br />practical. It certainly has been used for a <br />long time and yet we know that the efficiency <br />of summer fallowing is extremely low. Figures <br />vary of course, as you might expect they <br />would, depending upon years, area, soil types <br />and all this type of thing but they range in <br />the order of 15 to 30 percent of the water tl:).at <br />