Laserfiche WebLink
<br />24 <br /> <br />. Basic Assumption <br /> <br />31. Several plans for the development and operation of" the Glendo Unit were <br />studied in detail during the course of investigations. As a requisite to the <br />proposed plan it vms necessary to make certain assQ~ptions. The basic assumption <br />is that the operation of the Glendo Unit would not change the regimen of the river <br />as it now exists below Guernsey Reservoir. Therefore, the Glendo Unit would pro- <br />vide for no additional consumptive use of water and would cause a minimum change <br />in distribution of streamfloVl below Guernsey. -l/o. * * lit <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Paragraph 65e of the recommendations reads thus: <br /> <br />"The Glenda Unit be operated in a manner that will not affect the use of <br />waters of the North Platte River as it now exists below Guernsey Reservoir, <br />unless and until the states of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming, and the <br />Secretary of the Interior acting. in behalf of the Federal Goverrunent agree upon <br />a modified plan of operation to permit additional consumptive use of water." <br /> <br />The following is from the section of the project report dealing with the subject <br />of water rights: <br /> <br />"Glendo Water !i.ip;hts Assumed in Operation Studies <br /> <br />In operation studies, it is necessary to make assumptions regarding the <br />method of operation. The basic operating criteria are as follovffi: <br /> <br />(aO Glenda Unit would operate Without changing present conditions on the <br />river below Guernsey Reservoir. Under this assumption Glenda could gain title <br />to vmter only when all other reservoirs in the system were spilling. <br /> <br />(b) No replacement for-capacity lost to sediment at other reservoirs was <br />assumed. <br /> <br />(c) The water being used by irrigated lands that WOllJJd be inundated by <br />the Glenda Reservoir was assumed to be used elsewhere. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(d) All reservoirs in the system, including Glenda, were assumed to be <br />full at the beginning of the period selected for study.' <br /> <br />Operations under these basic assumptions would not in any way infringe on the. <br />. water rights of Colorado, Wyoming, or Nebraska. The studies showed that there <br />would have been no loss to the system due to increased evaporation brought about <br />by the construction of Glendo Reservoir. During the period of study the evapora- <br />tion losses due to Glendo were offset by carryover storage resulting from con- I <br />current Alcova-McConaughy Reservoir spills. No additional consumptive use was <br />assumed to be caused by increased irrigation or replacement of capacity lost <br />through sedimentation of other reservoirs, and the state of Wyoming was given <br />credit only for water now being consumed by those irrigated acres that would <br />be inundated by the Glendo Heservoir. An analysis was made of vmter supply <br />conditions prior to the period selected for detailed study. It supported the <br />assumption that all reservoirs would be full at the end of June 1, 1929." <br />