My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02241
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02241
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:13:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:12:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
12/9/1954
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />493 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />MR. SNYDER: "The real purpose is not trying to campaign <br />on a nation-wide basis but to sell our <br />program on what it actually means." <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD:"Do you think that this program can get <br />underway so as to do something at this <br />Session of Congress?" <br /> <br />MR. SNYDER: "The program and policy which this Board <br />and the Upper Colorado River Commission <br />has adopted up to the present time, if it <br />is on the same basis, if it is protecting <br />Colorado interests, then, yes, I think it <br />could get under way this Session of <br />Congress. If, however, there are unforeseen <br />changes in the legislation, then timing is <br />important. It is going to take a good <br />three weeks to get organized. If the same <br />bill is introduced and that is the bill <br />everyone has agreed to in the four States <br />then I think we have a good chance to <br />start going in this Congress." <br /> <br />~m. BAILEY: "Are there any other questions?" <br /> <br />'"Thank you very much, Mr. Snyder. <br />Mr. Banta, is there anything you have to <br />add?" <br /> <br />MR. BANTA: <br /> <br />"I have a couple of points I would like <br />to throw out for your consideration. How <br />are we going to expect our Congressmen, let <br />alone Congressmen from the other four <br />States, to get behind something the people <br />here know very little about? To be quite <br />frank, they don't know as much as they <br />should about the Upper Colorado River <br />Project. <br /> <br />"On the $40,000 business, the Dean will <br />recall that there was one vote cast against <br />the first one of these three things we <br />passed and that was on the business of <br />raising $10,000. I do not think.the <br />$40,000 is going to get the job done." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.