My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02205
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:13:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:12:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/10/1971
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />cease and desist order and go directly to the <br />courts. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />One of the things that might interest you <br />is that we have been getting in the last six <br />months, you probably read about it in the <br />paper also, a number of new federal laws, old <br />laws and new regulations, etc. In each case <br />they are asking that the state be the one to <br />carry out the leg work for them. One that <br />has probably gotten the most play in the <br />papers is the 1899 Refuse Act. This act was <br />originally designed to protect shipping in <br />navigable waters. However, it does say <br />'navigable waters and tributaries thereof'. <br />At a meeting I attended last October, there <br />was a speaker there from the Department of <br />Justice. I asked him what he considered <br />navigable water. He said 'Well, if it will <br />float a canoe or a log, I feel that is <br />navigable water'. He also said, 'It also <br />says tributaries thereof, so it could be <br />anything'. Our attorney who is assigned to <br />us from the Attorney General's office attended <br />another meeting and he got about the same <br />story. So it looks as though it does cover <br />all the streams in Colorado, that is, most of <br />the streams I would say. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In this law there are two permits that <br />are required. If you have a structure in the <br />stream you are required to get a permit from <br />the Corps of Engineers. A structure, again <br />at the meeting in Portland that I attended, <br />the attorney there pointed out that if you <br />have a discharge pipe that protrudes out into <br />the stream then you have to get a structure <br />permit in addition to a discharge permit. <br />The second part is the discharge permit. <br />This applies only to industrial waste. It <br />excludes any domestic waste or storm drainage. <br /> <br />I was talking to Colonel Lovejoy in <br />Colorado Springs just yesterday morning about <br />this subject. We have been waiting for appli- <br />cation forms that they are supposed to have. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.