Laserfiche WebLink
<br />year. Although I haven't received the <br />official letter yet, I did read in the paper <br />this morning that they had been approved with- <br />out reservations. <br /> <br />The standards include the criteria for <br />waters that are used for public water supply. <br />They include criteria for waters to be used <br />for fish and recreational use, industrial <br />waters, and agricultural waters. In addition <br />we have one broad standard that covers all <br />waters, irrespective of whether or not they <br />are classified. These are the basic standards. <br />possibly the most important of our basic <br />standards is the first one that says that we <br />shall have secondary treatment or its equiva- <br />lent. We define secondary treatment as the <br />removal of 80 percent of the organic constitu- <br />ents plus disinfection. <br /> <br />The commission now has a committee working <br />on effluent standards. Our law was amended in <br />'67 to allow for the adoption of effluent <br />standards if the stream standard is exceeded. <br />We have found that it has been exceeded in a <br />number of areas. As a result, we are in the <br />process of, preparing effluent standards. <br /> <br />In a newsletter I read this morning, it <br />points out that the President has requested <br />effluent standards across the board. I also <br />know that the federal people have contracted <br />with various agencies and consultants to pre- <br />pare effluent standards for 22 specific indus- <br />tries. So it would be my guess that within a <br />year or two we will be required to have efflu- <br />ent standards. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />One of the areas which did not receive I <br />much press coverage is the plan of implementa- <br />tion. This was another requirement of the <br />federal people back in 1966. They said also <br />that by June 30 of '67 we had to have a plan <br />of implementation or how we were going to <br />accomplish the task of cleaning up our streams. <br />