My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02191
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:13:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:12:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/18/1964
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..)~tH) <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />HR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br /> <br />I-m. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />request of this Board, in conformity with the <br />request of the two local conservancy districts <br />in the San Luis Valley, that the entire cost <br />of the project, including operation and mainte- <br />nance, be borne by the federal government. <br />Naturally, this is creating some problems inso- <br />far as the Commissioner of Reclamation is con- <br />erned. The ultimate cost would be about $8 <br />million and an annual operation is several <br />hundred thousand dollars. The question of <br />whether or not the federal government is going <br />to bear this entire cost is a critical one inso- <br />far as the eventual acceptance of the report is <br />concerned. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />vle have what is known as the Rio Grande <br />Salvage Project to which the State Board has <br />contributed a considerable amount of money in <br />past years. On this salvage project, the field <br />work is now completed and we anticipate a final <br />report on that project in the near future. <br /> <br />I think that is the only thing Of any <br />particular interest. I am always disturbed at <br />the implications that the San Juan-Chama project <br />is a Colorado project and I notice that in the <br />Public Works Appropriations Bill, just recently <br />approved by the House committee, that the listing <br />for this project is carried under appropriations <br />to the State of Colorado. I hope to get that <br />straightened out because this is not an appro- <br />priation for the State of Colorado." <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"Nr. Kroeger." <br /> <br />"I am most happy to find an individual <br />that thinks like I do on this. I have been <br />screaming about this being listed as a Colorado <br />project since it was first conceived and, Larry, <br />I \-lelcome you to the fold:" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />"Any further comments or questions on the <br />report of Region 51 If not, Mr. Odell, will you <br />give the report of the U.S.G.S., please?" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.