My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02177
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02177
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:13:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:12:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/5/1952
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />63 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />of the Senate had met and concluded to vote the bill out favorably without <br />further hearings, provided no report was received from the Secretary of <br />the Interior which raised new factual considerations. Thus 'far, Mr. <br />Breitenstein said, no report had been received from the Secretary. Mr. <br />Breitenstein expressed his opinion that if the Board believed it desirable <br />to modify the excess land provisions of the Federal Reclamation laws, as <br />they apply to the San Luis Valley, this Board should consider the adoption of <br />a resolution on the subject. Similar action of the Board had previously <br />been taken, but in view of t he current situation, he believed it important <br />for the Board to reiterate its position on the subject. There ensued <br />discussion of the matter. <br /> <br />Following such discussion, John W. Beaty offered and moved the <br />adoption of the following resolution: <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the provisions of the Federal Reclamation Laws, which <br />limit to 160 acres the area of land wliich may be retained in one <br />ownership and yet receive water from a Federal Reclamation Project, <br />are impractical and undesirable when applied to Colorado agriculture, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the basic reasons asserted in justification of the 160 acre <br />limitation, which are the prevention of speculation, the assurance of <br />payment to the Federal Government of the reimbursable project costs, and <br />the creation of family operated farm units, may be better satisfied by <br />a relaxation of the 160 acre limitation which will truly reflect the <br />conditions on each reclamation project, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the success of existing and proposed Federal Reclamation <br />Projects in Colorado requires a modification of the excess land pro- <br />visions so that the hard and fast 160 acre limit may be adjusted to <br />meet the conditions of individual projects, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on the Conejos Division of the San Luis Valley Project <br />the use for conservation purposes of t he constructed Platoro Dam is <br />denied to the water users of the Conejos Water Conservancy District <br />becau.se of the insistence upon full compliance with the 160 acre limi- <br />tation even though high officials of the Federal Government have in <br />public statements recognized that the application of su.ch limitation <br />to the Conejos area is unrealistic, <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, liE IT RESOLVED that the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board favors a modification of the excess land provisions of the Federal <br />Reclamation Laws which will remove the fixed 160 acre limit 'and provide <br />for some method of establishing, for Federal Reclamation Projects, a <br />limitation on acreage which will reflect the true situation of each <br />project area from an economic and agricUltural standpoint. <br /> <br />. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />favors S. 2610 which provides for a modification of the excess land <br />provisions for the authorized San Luis Valley Project and deplores the <br />attitude of the Washington bureaucracy in opposing that bill. <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution shall be <br />sent to the members of the Colorado Congressional delegation and that <br />the Director and Attorney for the Board are directed to proceed to carry <br />out the objectives of this Resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.