Laserfiche WebLink
<br />73. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />John C. Page, former Commissioner of the Bureau of Rechmation, <br />who is a resident. of Colorado and who has taken a vi tal interest in <br />Colorado River matters, stated that he wished to emphasize the necessity <br />of Colorado formulating a definite policy v..ith respect tn the Colorado <br />River. He said; "Thi s is going to be a hot seat. Ilariy bills relating <br />to tile Colorado River are !'Ping to come before the Congress and tha <br />Board shoul d be ready to take a derini te position with respect tn them." <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relative tc any action which the Board should <br />take at the present meeting relating to the se problems, and whether or <br />not any attempt mould be made to set forth directives tn be kept in <br />mind at the fur thcaning meeting of Governor s at Cheyenne, Wyoming. It <br />was fimll y decid ed that until further study hBd been undertaken, the <br />Board should merely expre ss its support of early consuIIlll1l.tion of an <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Compact consistent with the ascertainment <br />of all pertinent facts and legal considerations involved in the making <br />of a COOlpa ct. <br /> <br />Accordingly, it was moved by L. Ward Bannister and <br />seconded by Silmon Smith that the Colorado Water Conserva- <br />tion Board favors the consummation of an Upper Colorado River <br />Basin Compoct at the earliest possible date consistent with <br />full consideration of all of the engineering facts end legal <br />problems involved in the making of a Compact. <br /> <br />Upon vote being taken, the motian WaS unanimously <br />carri sd and declared adopted. <br /> <br />Silmon Smith, at thi s point, made a statemsn t reI ating to project <br />investigations in western Colorado and expressed the fear that these <br />investigations were not proceeding on a par wi th investiga tions fur <br />transmountein diversion s. He called a.ttention to the principle, there- <br />tofore approved by tile Board, that exportations of Colorado River water <br />from the Basin were subject tn the protection of pres611t and prospective <br />uses of water ,.1.thin the Basin. This principle, he explained, cannot be <br />fully carried out unless adequate studies are completed to indicate the <br />potential uses within the Basin. He warned that if the State is to <br />succe ssfully carry out it s e stabli shed policy, the Board should see to <br />it that investigations for water utilization and control v,1.thin the <br />Basin and for exportations out 0 f the Basin are fully integrated and <br />kept on an equitable level of 9Ccomplishmsnt. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Director explained that, recogniurl'g the validity of Mr. Smith's <br />statement, there had been set up a steering corrmittee, mede up of the <br />Directors of Region 4 and of Region 7, the Chief Hydraulic Engineer of <br />the Bureau of Reclamation and himsel f a s Director 0 f the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board, tn accomplish the objectives which Mr. Smith had <br />mentioned. T10is conmittee had held severAl meetings am was attempting <br />to integrate project investigations for the utilization of Colorado River <br />water ,,"-thin the state and to ascertain potential uses within the natural <br />basin am the amount of surplus which could be exported from the Basin <br />and at the same tine protect present and potential uses in yrestern Colorado. <br /> <br />, - .., <br />