My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02139
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02139
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:46 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:11:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/21/1974
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />!-Jr. Kochman: <br />that study. <br />made. <br /> <br />I really don't think that is our responsibility to make <br />I would hope that the commission itself would. have that <br /> <br />Mr. Kuiper: Well, it would be somebody's responsibility and I agree <br />with you. It would be the Groundwater Commission's responsibility, <br />but I think they should be given an opportunity to do that before we <br />take any action on this particular recommendation. <br /> <br />14r. Moses: I disagree with Mr. Kuiper. This board is authorized to <br />appropriate water for this purpose. The Groundwater Commission has no <br />jurisdiction to make a determination as to whether we can appropriate <br />water for surface flows. <br /> <br />I think it has to start some place and if it starts here, then we can <br />move along. <br /> <br />Mr. Vandemoer: Ray, could I add to this? Mr. Winfield is not against <br />this. In fact, his only worry is well taken in that they should know <br />about it. And they should be able to go from there. <br /> <br />Mr. Kuiper: There should be some input from the Groundwater Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Sparks: I am a member of the Groundwater Commission. I wrote the <br />original groundwater law. There is nothing in that law which gives <br />the Groundwater Commission any authority over surface water. We are <br />making a surface appropriation and the Groundwater Act is very unmis- <br />takably clear that it refers only to the drilling of wells. That is <br />the only jurisdiction of the Groundwater Commission. This is of no <br />concern to the Groundwater Commission, except as future decrees may <br />impair the decree that we expect to get. We will be getting only a <br />junior decree as of the date of the filing. I don't think it involves <br />the Ground Water Commission, and I don't think it involves the <br />Republican River Compact. We have a compact to deliver water to Kansas, <br />but it is not affected and cannot be affected by any state law or any <br />decree. <br /> <br />!-Jr. Stapleton: Well. the nice thing about writing your own law, you <br />know it is the only one that is perfectly clear. <br /> <br />(laughter) <br /> <br />I would think that we could entertain a motion that this be approved <br />and that the attorney of the board be directed to make the necessary <br />appropriation. Is that a proper motion for this? <br /> <br />-35- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.