Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />r,;, '( 1 6 R:C] <br /> <br />VRANESH AND RAISCH <br /> <br />ATTORNEYS AT l..AW <br /> <br />"':!::~l:IY 'N. "'AiSC'" <br />..10""" l'l. I-lf:NOe:~SON <br />MIC"lAEL o. S"'IMMII"~ <br />ElJOENE,J. RIORCAN <br />i='AUL.,J. Z:I,.I$ <br /> <br />1720 14-:::0 STRe::e:T. SUirE 200 <br /> <br />;:;0:01'11-::;( '~~A...e::S... ''''E''';~~:::' <br /> <br />p. O. SOX 871 <br /> <br />SI'l'IAN ...,. ........;:AREN;J$ <br />OCUQI..AS.A..OO,..I:..OI....:::; <br />RAY ANN e"'AMME"'I <br />QREGO",,,,..I. C\..!'"'TON <br /> <br />BOULDER. COLORADO 80306 <br /> <br />rELEl'l'l-lONE 303/44)-6' 51 <br />TEl..ECOPIER 303/ 4~3-9Sao <br /> <br />May 15, 1991 <br /> <br />steven O. Sims, Esq. <br />Office of the Attorney General <br />Petroleum Building - lOth Floor <br />110 16th street <br />Denver, CO 80202 <br /> <br />Re: Case Nos. 86CW226 and 88CW178 <br />Board of County Commissioners of the County of Arapahoe <br /> <br />Dear steve: <br /> <br />Please find enclosed a draft Intergovernmental Agreement <br />between Arapahoe and CWCB which we have discussed. I do not have <br />formal approval of the Agreement from the board of county <br />commissioners at this time, but I wanted to send you this draft <br />as soon as possible to expedite the process. <br /> <br />As we discussed on the telephone, Arapahoe currently plans <br />to operate the Union Park Reservoir Project so as to maintain <br />minimum and maximum flows on Lottis Creek below the reservoir. <br />Therefore, the segment on Lottis Creek between Union Park <br />Reservoir and its confluence with the Taylor River will continue <br />to be accessible for public use to its current extent. I have <br />tried to address this situation fully in the Agreement. <br /> <br />In addition, please be advised only 4,400 feet of the Lottis <br />Creek segment within the Union Park Reservoir basin would be <br />inundated by the additional junior conditional water rights <br />applied for in Case Nos. 86CW226 and 88CW178. The majority of <br />that stream segment would be inundated by the conditional water <br />right decreed in Case No. 82CW340 which is senior to CWCB's <br />Lottis Creek minimum stream flow. However, as you can see from <br />the Agreement, Arapahoe agrees to mitigate for the full 3-1/2 <br />miles within the reservoir in order to make a good faith effort <br />to settle these cases. <br /> <br />arap178 \ letters \ s lals' <br />