Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLORADO'S AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS COULD <br />AFFECT COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN THE NFIP <br /> <br />Colorado was notified on December 19, 1990.that the <br />state's agricultural exemption from building permits <br />(CRS 30-28-205, 1973 Revised) may prevent unincor- <br />porated counties from carrying out the requirements of <br />the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Should <br />the State Attorney General's Office substantiate this con- <br />cern, the Colorado General Assembly may have to enact <br />legislation this session to prevent suspension of 48 <br />Colorado counties from the NFIP. <br /> <br />Vnder current state statutes, it appears that counties can- <br />not require a building permit in special flood hazard <br />areas for a structure for agricultural purposes. Absence <br />of this authority means the counties cannot enforce the <br />minimum requirements for participation in the NFIP. <br />The consequence of new enabling legislation will require <br />all agriculture structures within designated floodplains to <br />obtain floodplain developmenfpermits. <br /> <br />Vnless legislation is passed removing the exemption of <br />agricultural structures from county floodplain manage- <br />ment regulations, 48 of Colorado's NFIP participating <br /> <br />counties will face suspension from the NFIP. Suspen- <br />sion will impact the counties as follows: <br /> <br />Flood insurance will not be available, <br /> <br />Federal agencies may not provide grants or loans for <br />.buildings in identified special flood hazard areas of com- <br />munities not participating in the NFIP. <br /> <br />No federal mortgage insurance may be provided in iden- <br />tified flood hazard areas, and <br /> <br />In the event of federally declared flood disaster, no <br />federal disaster assistance would be available. <br /> <br />FEMA is presently undertaking such action against the <br />State of Missouri which has until March 4, 1991 to adopt <br />amending legislation or its counties will face suspension <br />from the NFIP. <br /> <br />"FLOOD STAGE" <br />SURVEY RESULTS <br /> <br />In September 1990, the CWCB requested ideas from our <br />readers, by survey, as to how to enhance our "FLOOD <br />STAGE" newsletter. The results of the survey are as <br />follows: <br /> <br />The specific types of articles readers would like: <br /> <br />-Floodplain management <br />-Local drainage and flood control <br />-Floodplain regulations <br />-Flood hazard mitigation <br />-Floodplain mapping engineering <br />-V nique hazards <br />-Flood warning systems <br />-Flood insurance <br /> <br />26% <br />19% <br />12% <br />14% <br />12% <br />7% <br />5% <br />5% <br /> <br />More federal/state assistance is required by local <br />governments for: . <br /> <br />-Assistance in the NFIP map revision <br />process 37% <br />-Providing flood insurance coverage and <br />rate information 18% <br />-Determination of flood hazard risks in <br />unidentified flood hazard.. .17% <br />-Determination of base flood elevations 15% <br />-Determination ofNFIP mapping data .13% <br />Local support of the community's floodplain <br />management is: <br /> <br />-About the same 58% <br />-Improving 23% <br />-Worsening 19% <br /> <br />My community's most frequent question regarding <br />floodplain management is: <br /> <br />-Am I in the 100-year floodplain? <br />-What is thenood elevation on my <br />property? <br />-Why do I have to buy flood insurance <br />when my neighbors don't? <br />-How much is this going to cost? <br />-Why can't I build in this area? <br />-Can the city and county maps be consolidated? <br /> <br />1ST <br />) <br />2NIJ <br /> <br />3RD <br />4TH <br />5TH <br />6TH <br /> <br />DA VID WALKER NAMED <br />DIRECTOR OF THE COLORADO <br />WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board, the state's <br />primary water planning and development agency, has an- <br />nounced its appointment of David W. Walker as its new <br />director. Walh'f replaces Bill McDonald. .. <br /> <br />"The '90s will be a critical--and increasingly contentious- <br />-time for all of us involved in water resources in <br />Colorado," Walker said. <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board studies. <br />.proposed watd projects and r~eommends projects to the <br />.General Assembly for fundinglhrough the board's Con- <br />. struction Fund; helps plan and develop water-storage and <br />flood control projects for federal and state authorization; <br />approves ,floodplain delineations to guide local govern-, \, <br />ments in floodplain zoning; assists local governments i"V <br />the implementation of the National Flood Insurance Pro- <br />gram; obtains and holds water rights for insrream flows <br />and lake levels on behalf of the people of Colorado; <br />manages state water policies and represents the state's <br />