My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02112
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:11:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/9/1978
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. KROEGER: -Is there any other comment with regard to <br />Archuleta Counties:' diversions, appropriations? Okay. <br />come up at our next meeting. <br /> <br />Hinsdale and <br />Then they will <br /> <br />MR. HELTON: They will be on the next agenda as. finals and the rest <br />will be on the agenda as preliminary? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: <br />you are going <br />there also. <br /> <br />Yes, I think so, unless we included Grand County where <br />to do some work. You may want to make a recommendation <br /> <br />MR. HELTON: I took it that Eagle County will carry that over as <br />preliminary. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Eagle County was carried over as preliminary. <br /> <br />MR. HELTON: Either way, we will be able to make changes and meet with <br />the people. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Okay. Is. there anything else on minimum streamflows? . . <br /> <br />Item 4 then is the consideration of floodplain reports. Larry, will <br />you handle that, please? <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Mr. Chairman, members of the board. All of these flood- <br />plain information reports have been prepared in accordance with <br />criteria issued by this board. In every case, they have been reviewed <br />quite thoroughly with the local authorities involved. In each case, <br />the local authorities. have requested this board to approve these <br />floodplain designations as required by statute. As far as we-know, <br />there is no controversy surrounding any of these designations. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Okay. Does anybody from the board have any comments .on <br />any of the projects? There are seven of them before us today. Does <br />anybody from the audience wish to comment? <br /> <br />Do we have a motion for their approval then? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. FURNEAUX: Iso move. <br /> <br />MR. GORMLEY: I second it. <br /> <br />(There being no discussion,. the motion was put to a voice vote and was <br />carried without dissent.) (See Appendices C thru I.) <br /> <br />'MR. KROEGER: Larry, that's down to the Director's report. <br /> <br />-39- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.