Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. KROEGER: All right. Let's cover only page 1 then. Again, are <br />there comments from the board? Are there comments from the audience? <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Before we get to the audience, I would like to add that to <br />the best of my recollection, we have not had any adverse comments. <br />Duane, have we had something on that? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. HELTON: No, we have not. <br /> <br />MR. TEN EYCK: Mr. Chairman, members of the board, I am with the Rio <br />Blanco Oil Shale Company, but I am speaking as much as a concerned <br />citizen as I am in behalf of our oil shale activities. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Tom, just before you start, are you speaking to page l? <br /> <br />MR. TEN EYCK: I have only the notice and agenda before me, Larry, and <br />I don't know what is on page 1 or on page 2. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: .Well, there are copies back there. <br /> <br />MR. TEN EYCK: I'm sorry. Then I am out of order, because I want to <br />speak to page 2. Forgive me. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Tom as a member of our board for many years. It's nice <br />to have you present, Tom. I hadn't noticed you sitting over there. <br /> <br />MR. SHERMAN: Mr. Cha.irman, hearing no further comments from either the <br />board or the audience, I would move that we accept the recommendations <br />as proposed on page 1. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Please notice that we have tried to break this down as <br />nearly as possible by counties. That is the reason for the different <br />pages. We are now talking about page 1 relating to Larimer, Clear <br />Creek and Park Counties. <br /> <br />MR. JACKSON: I. second the motion. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(There being no further discussion, the motion was put to a voice vote <br />and was carried without dissent. See AppendixB for recolIllllended stream- <br />flows. ) <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Now we will take up page 2 which is the Rio Blanco area <br />and, Tom, you are no longer out of order. <br /> <br />MR. TEN EYCK: I still may be, Mr. Chairman, because the points <br />indicated between what seems to be minimum flows are discussed further <br />upstream than that section which I had been led to believe was going to <br /> <br />-15- <br />