My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02112
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:11:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/9/1978
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. KROEGER: Are we ready:to take some action in regard to this? <br /> <br />MR. SHERMAN: Mr. Chairman, I would move that the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board support Senate Bill No. 69 as proposed and presented <br />by:Senator Anderson; <br /> <br />(There being no further discussion, the motion was put to a voice vote <br />and was carried without dissent.) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I second it. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: It's passed. <br /> <br />- <br />Agenda item~umber:3 is. the considerati9n <br />streamf1ows. Larry,wil1 you be han~ling <br /> <br />- <br />of the appropriations' <br />that or will Duane? <br /> <br />for <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: I will start out on it, Mr.. CJ:lairman.' <br /> <br />First, the .matter of minimum streamf10ws :a1ways calls to mind' our <br />former.board member, Clarence: Burr.. I asked Clarence to'be here today. <br />We have not properly recognized,.. up :to this 1;:ime, his: 'long s'erviceas: <br />a member of the board. -I am hopeful :that he will be here ~hort1y so; <br />that we can properly recognize his services. I hope that he will also <br />be ftb1e .to have lunch with us. <br /> <br />Let me take up ,firs t, the way it is on the agenda, the cons ideration : <br />of final streamflow recommendations. ascon1;:ained in :your list.' Thes'e <br />were considered in a preliminary fashion at :the last board meeting <br />in ftccordance with our policy. _ We have had some disc:uss,ion with <br />varipus people abput those recommendations.. I suggest at this time, <br />Mr. Chairman, that we simply' go through that final lis t to dete::rmine,:' <br />first, whether or not any board members.haveany comments on them; If <br />they do, then we have staff members here from our board and from the <br />Division .of Wildlife to go into those particular' appropriations: <br /> <br />Then, secondly, if any members of the: audience have anything they: wish <br />to state with regard to these final approp~iations, we will hear them.' <br /> <br />MR. KORE(;ER: Are. there co~nts from: the board regarding the list. on I <br />pages 1. and 2? : I don't think they are numbered that way,. however. <br />It's the first two pages. It involves the rivers of Larimer County, <br />Clear Creek, Park, and Rio Blanco Counties. . <br /> <br />Are there comments from the audience?' <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I think we had better reserve discussion on page 2 <br />because we did have a discussion on that this morning, Fred. <br /> <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.