My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02109
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:09 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
6/15/1950
Description
Table of Contents, Minutes and Resolutions. Volumes I and II of Transcription of Meeting
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />19 <br /> <br />MR. ROGERS: Any adtU.t1onal money other than thls <br />$500,000, is that to be rei~bursablet <br />MR. STONE: Under the present law, any amount of money <br />that lsexpended on a project whlch h ultimately bullt, those <br />funds used fl'0III gene~l investigatlonal moneys are added to the <br />coat of t~eproJect and become relmbursable. Th&tte the pree~ <br />ent law, but. the C. R. D. tunds were l!lon~relmbursable. <br />I wonder, .are there any other questions' <br />The next item, Mr. Chalrman, is the Colorado Rlver stor- <br />ageproJeot. That lethe project for the comprehensive devel- <br />opment of the entlre Upper ColoradoR1ver basin and was made <br />possible through the Upper Colorado River Basin Contract. At <br />the last meetlng of the Board, the offlclalcomments to Region 4 <br />of the Bureau were made and submltted. The Upper Colorado River <br />oommlss1onsubnitted cGIlIlIIents; the four states all agreed. <br />T~treport lsnow 1n the process of belng revised in the <br />office of Region 4 of the Bureau of Reclamatlon. It has Dot <br />been submitted to the Washington office of the Bureau. It was <br />anticipated when we offered our comments that it would soon be <br />submltted; however, the oontroversy came up over the storage <br />of water in the Echo 'ark lUl1t of the project and the Dlnosaur <br />National Monument; and the Director of Region 4 ot the Bureau <br />of. Reolamation apparently has no authority to submit these <br />reports te Washington until this ltuestlon of the storage of <br />water in the Dinosaur National Monument has been resolved by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.