Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />,.LEI TI~ "-ECo;, VENED <br /> <br />November 17, 1937 <br /> <br />at 10:00 A. M. <br /> <br />'i <br /> <br />Board members present were: <br /> <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />, <br /> <br />Chris [aUrich <br />Byron Rogers <br />M. C. Hinderlider <br />Edw. D. Foster <br />Miss V6ne rointer <br />Wayne N. Aspinall <br />John B. O'Rourke <br />P. S. E.lting <br />J. iil. Dille <br /> <br />J.lamosa <br />Las Animas <br />Denver <br />Denver <br />Pueblo <br />Palisade <br />Durango <br />Hot Sulphur Springs <br />Fort Morgan <br /> <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />Others present: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Clifford H. Stone <br />C. L. Pbtterson <br />R. J. Tipton <br />George Corlett <br />Ralph C. Carr <br />^ <br />,-c", <br /> <br />Attorney for Board <br />Chief Engineer for the Board <br />Consulting Engineer for the BOard <br />Monte Vista, Colorado <br />Denver, Colorado <br /> <br />The Board went into Executive Session because of consideration of Rio <br />Grande Compact Negotiations, ~r, Stone presented the printed report of the <br />activities of the Board through the office of Attorney for the Board end <br />engineering depertlJient since the last meeting. He called a,ttention to certain <br />problems, policies and questions presented to the Board. He m8ae reference to <br />the efforts to secure appropriation in_the coming session of Congress to make <br />the proposed PIkansas-Gunnison Transmountain survey. He pointed out that the <br />Congressional Delegation especially Mr. Martin was strenuously urging tnis <br />proposed allotment of funds. It was suggested that the feasibi~ity of ~~is project <br />and whether or not there was available water, could not be determined until the <br />survey wns com~ted; that surveys on all other transmountain orojects in <br />Colorado, as well as Chema-San Juan Transmountain surveys, had been' allowed <br />and such surveys largely completed; and that this Gunnison-,~~ansas Survey <br />should be started for the further reason that it will have a bearing on the <br />division of water between the Four U~per Basin States of the Colorado River <br />Basin. Mr. Stone stated that he had taken this matter up with the <br />Congressmen and Senators while in ,'iashir,gton. P.t thi~ time no resolution <br />or motion ,,<os passed by the Board but there Vias a generel expression of <br />e:oproval of the application for the survey. I,Ir. Stone poin'~ed out that <br />progress was being made in connection with certain "estern Slope Surveys, <br />pE'rticularly the North Fork Project, the ~lancos <'roject ana the Yampa Project. <br />He advised that he and Mr. Petterson had gone over the Mancos <'roject .ith the <br />people there 'ond th1:t a written cO.;JIlent of the State Board at the request of tae <br />Reclamation Service would be mede. ae further referred to the small reservoir <br />statute, explaining that an fidequate approprifition had been made and the eITlo'mt <br />Eve.ilable for esch project "as limited to ~50,OOO, which amolmt was too small. <br /> <br /> <br />Then followed a re)ort of the p,io Grende Compact Negotations fit Santa <br />Fe by fllr, stone, !Jr. Hinder-Hder, the Compact Commis~ioner, followed by <br />Mr. Ti~ton, after noon recess. <br />