Laserfiche WebLink
<br />agricultural water use as outlined in the Interim Operating Criteria, Progress will be monitored monthly, <br /> <br />April 1 Forecast of 2002 Year-End Colorado River <br />Water Use by the California Agricultural Agencies <br /> <br /> 5 <br />OJ 4 <br />" <br />- <br />clJ <br />~ 3 <br />u <br />" <br />'0 <br />III 2 <br />c <br />~ <br />:; <br /> 1 <br /> 0 <br /> J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J <br /> First of Month <br /> <br /> <br />3,850 MAF <br />mmmm 2003 Target = 3.74 MAF <br />......2006 Target = 3.64 MAF <br />n.n. _" 2009 Target = 3.53 MAF <br />... -- -- -- 2012 Target = 3.47 MAF <br />.m.~m..Year-End Forecast <br />--+- Use This Year <br /> <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District Meeting: The River District voted on April 17th to authorize <br />litigation challenging the Bureau of Reclamation's operations ofthe Colorado-Big Thompson Project (C- <br />BT), Specifically, the River District is alleging that C-BT has diverted west slope water when native east <br />slope water was available to C-BT, Additionally, they allege that C-BT is diverting from the west slope in <br />excess of what is needed and giving that water away through a "non charge" program, The River District has <br />stated that thev will continue to nursue all nossihle remedies hefore resorting: to the authorized 1i.tig:ation, A <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />J <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />-W~""""'~_~-~1#-~--~--"'---~' ... <br /> <br />J <br />j <br /> <br />J~J')f <br />-~ <br /> <br /> <br />.il <br /> <br />