My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02094
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2017 2:02:31 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:10:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/23/2002
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Stream and Lake Prqtectlon Program <br />Summary of Re~olved Cases <br /> <br />Section 9.41 of the ISF Rules states that: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"In the event the pretrial resolution includes terms and conditions preventing injury or interference and does not <br />involve a modification, or acceptance of injury or interference with mitigation, the Board is not required to review and <br />ratify the pretrial resolution, Staff may authorize its counsel to sign any court documents necessary to finalize this type <br />of pretrial resolution without Board ratification," <br /> <br />Staff has resolved issues of potential injury in the following water court case and authorized the Attorney General's <br />Office to enter into stipulations that protect the CWCB' s water rights: <br /> <br />(I) Case No. 1-99CWI99; Centennial Water and Sanltatloit District et al. <br /> <br />The Board ratified the statement of opposition filed in this case at its March 23, 2000, meeting. The Board has instream <br />flow water rights on Tarryall Creek that may have be injured by this application. The Board's main objective in filing a <br />statement of opposition in this case was to assure that the Applicant's change of water rights from irrigation uses in South <br />Park to municipal uses in Centennial would not injure the CWCB's instream flow water right on Tarryall Creek. In <br />particular, the CWCB sought to have Centennial continue the 'same irrigation retum flow patterns that have historically <br />occurred, The Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney General' $ Office, has negotiated a settlement that fully protects the <br />Board's instream flow water rights, <br /> <br />The Board holds the following instream flow rights that could have been injured by this application: <br /> <br />Case No, <br />1-76W8229 <br /> <br />Stream <br />Tarryall Creek <br /> <br />Amount (cfs) <br />7 <br /> <br />Anpropriation Date <br />1/14/1976 <br /> <br />The Applicant has agreed to the following terms and conditioris that will provide full protection for the Board's e <br />instream flow water rights on Tarryall Creek: <br /> <br />· The Applicant has agreed to divert enough water into a groundwater retum flow plan facility to replicate non-irrigation <br />season groundwater retum flows from historical irrigation, The new recharge ditch and pond will be unlined and <br />maintained so that infiltration of the water into the aquifer underlying the meadow will occur, <br />· For the first seven years of operation of the recharge facilitie's, the Applicant will maintain eight of the existing <br />monitoring wells and also take 13 groundwater level measur~ments from each of the monitoring wells, according to <br />schedule laid out in the decree. In addition, for the first sevep years of operation, the Applicant will install, operate, <br />and maintain six V -notch weirs for the purpose of monitoring surface water flow within such facilities. <br />· The Applicant will also install, operate, and collect data froIrt and maintain a gage on Tarryall Creek at Boreas Pass <br />Road, <br /> <br />(2) Case No. 4-98CW96; John S. Hendricks <br /> <br />The Board ratified the statement of opposition filed in this case at its July 23, 200 I, meeting, The Board has instream flow <br />water rights on West Creek that could have been injured by ithis application. The Board's main objective in filing a <br />statement of opposition in this case was to prevent the Applicdnt from diverting water out-of-priority at the new junior <br />points of diversion, and prevent the Applicant diverting its watet right at an upstream point of diversion at times when the <br />CWCB's intervening West Creek instream flow was not being satisfied, The Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney <br />General's Office, has negotiated a settlement that fully protects the Board's instream flow water rights. <br /> <br />The Board holds the following instream flow rights that could have been injured by this application: <br /> <br />Case No, <br />4,77CW3296 <br /> <br />Stream <br />West Creek <br /> <br />Amount (cfs) <br />6 <br /> <br />ApproPriation Date <br />1/19/1977 <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.