My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02093
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02093
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:11:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:09:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/18/1979
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. HELTON: Before we discuss the agreement, maybe we should point <br />out that Denver has an existing water system in the Williams Basin. <br />They have developments that divert water from Bobtail, Mcqueary and <br />Steelman Creeks. Those are presently senior water rights. <br /> <br />In addition to that, they have senior conditional water rights that I <br />allow them to take water from the drainage of the Middle Fork, South <br />Fork and Darling Creek. The conclusion of all this is that the <br />Denver Water Board's water rights are senior to whatever water rights' <br />this board requires. <br /> <br />Back to the agreement--under Section 1, the Denver Water Board agrees <br />to make certain minimum bypasses on the" decrees. These bypasses and <br />other recommended appropriations are extracted in the attached three <br />pages. <br /> <br />On Bobtail, the Denver Water Board agrees to bypass one cubic foot <br />per second during the summer season, which is May 15 through August.. <br />From Steelman Creek, the Denver Water Board also agrees to bypass one <br />second foot, and that is the same period. These streams are presently, <br />through their existing system, completely dried up. <br /> <br />On the Middle Fork, the Denver Water Board agrees to operate its <br />diversion system so that flows at two second feet summer and one second <br />foot winter are maintained at a point relatively low on the drainage, <br />but that point is the point where the fishery begins. So from the <br />standpoint of the Middle Fork, it is a good flow. The Division of <br />Wildlife would probably agree with all these numbers on the bypass.. <br /> <br />On Short Creek, on the South Fork, the Denver Water Board agrees to by- <br />pass or operate the diversion: structures so that we have a flow of five <br />second feet in summer, .two and a half second feet in winter. <br /> <br />To repeat, the Denver Water Board agrees to operate its diversion <br />structures to provide a flow at the confluence of the South Fork with <br />Short Creek of five second feet summer, two and a half second feet <br />winter. <br /> <br />In addition.to that, another flow control is provided of four second <br />feet in the summer, two second feet winter on the South Fork a distance <br />of seven-tenths of a mile upstream from the confluence of Short Creek. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />On Darling Creek, the Denver Water Board agrees to operate its diver- <br />sion structures so that a flow of three second feet in summer and <br />two second feet in winter is provided at the U.S..G.S. Gauging Station. <br />That gauging station, again, roughly corresponds to the beginning of <br />the fishery on Darling Creek.. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.