Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 4 <br />i Project Approach (RFP Section 4.6) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CWCB, the Advisory Committee, and other survey participants will also provide some leverage <br />to the survey team in getting participation horn the target group of water users and providers. <br />As the survey, is deployed and response rates - and more importantly response gaps - become <br />known, CWCB and the Advisory CommitteE! will be able to determine where they maY need to <br />facilitate access and provide introductions to selected water users and providers for the survey <br />team. <br /> <br />Participation will also be promoted with endor~ement letters from DNR and the Governor, if <br />they can be arranged, as well as through describing the project at hand and the need for <br />participation. Introductory screeners will also emphasize the opportunity for participants to <br />learn more about the resources available to them (i.e., loans and other assistance from state <br />entities). An 800 number will be made available to the contact listi further enhancing the <br />response rate. In addition, we recommend that a pre-recorded message horn the Governor be <br />developed to encourage the participation of hardLto-reach contacts. <br /> <br />As a fall back, the survey team will reservE) more rigorous engagement techniques ~" such as <br />face-ta-face meetings - for those targeted water hsers and providei'Swhose participation in the <br />survey is' deemed imperative, of which there are certain to be a few. The survey team will <br />persist with additional phone calls, and if necessary, face-te-face meetings. Reach requires the <br />planning and implementation ofa multi-phased, multi-pronged approach. <br /> <br />Getting the Right Information . <br />To reiterate, the primary testing of the survey instrument, presented to the right set of sample <br />participants will allow the project team to identify shortcomings in the survey design and <br />delivery that limit the collection of the information needed to address project issues and meet <br />project objectives. Through the phased project, the shortcomings can be corrected and <br />appropriate survey questions and charmels "an be created and implemented: <br /> <br />It is possible that the survey instrument may require miilor modification (tweaking) during its <br />final deployment. The Bouvette Consulting T~am will utilize standard feedback procedures <br />and policies allowing our telephone canvasser~ and other staff on the survey "front-lines" to <br />provide the project management team with ihsight into poorly worded and/ or confusing <br />questions that are identified by water user or provider feedback. We will also use feedback <br />procedure,s from our staff of statisticians who will perform intermediate analyses of the data as <br />the data are collected, to identify questions that may be modified to improve the value of the <br />response. This type of continuous quality "onb;ol process is standard operating procedure for <br />each of our project teams. <br /> <br />Managing the Information i ' <br />Our staff of telephone canvassers typically gath~rsthe information obtained through the survey <br />deployment. Each individual is prompted by !questions by a computer program resident on <br />individual computers. The same computer program is used by the telephone canvassers to <br />track the respondent answers, with data entry prompted with programmed screens. The data is <br />then warehoused in networked drives that can be accessed by the statisticians and incorporated .' , <br />into a single project database. The project database manager is therefore responsible for <br />database design, telephone canvasser training, Gonsistency cif use, and maintaining the integrity <br /> <br />Section 4', Page 20 <br />