My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02063
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:35 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:08:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/30/1954
Description
Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, . <br />~S'~ <br /> <br />been negotiat?d fo~ the States. I have glanced over the synopsis <br />of the Case B~ll. I dpn't think we are on the safe side in asking <br />for something here. Our best interest'is to preserve ,vhat we have <br />and keep it from being interfered with. Possibly we don't need <br />either the Case Bill or the Butler Compact Bill." <br /> <br />Mr. Bailey: "What effect will it have on the other compacts?": <br /> <br />Mr. Breitenstein: "It will not affect our compact. All or them <br />carry a potential hazard. For that reason I have not been too <br />enthusiastic about Colorado participating. So . far as the Case <br />Bill is concerned it can serve no good purpose. I think it <br />might possibly be a precedent for something that might be more <br />authoritative. Colorado has nothing to gain by participating <br />in the Compact. That being the situation, I cannot see any <br />reason y,<hy we should favor p.ither of these proposals." <br /> <br />l.!r. Bailey: "Any other cormnen ts?" <br /> <br />Mr. Breitenstein: "So far as the Inter-Agency Conunittee is con- <br />cerned, the expenses have been ver-:r small. I think it is entirely <br />proper and desirable to go along with the participation in the <br />Missouri Basin Inter-Agency Conuni~tEile." <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford: I think we should keEilp in mind that there are two <br />Missouri Basin organizations now. l'he Missouri Basin Conunittee is <br />not Very active. It meets once a YEilar. The Inter-Agency Conunittee <br />meets monthly or at least 'every two months. No actions are taken <br />by the latter Conunittee. I think WEil ought to keep in touch With <br />what's going on. So far as the IntEilr-Agency is concerned there <br />is no doubt in my mind that Colorado should cooperate. We can <br />stay in both of those conunittees without costing the state more <br />than seven or eigh~ hundred a year." . <br /> <br />Mr. Moses: "Vie should probably keep an observer on hand even if <br />we don't "participate." <br /> <br />Mr. Saunders: If the compact is not effective until ratified by all <br />the states, other states could not take advantage of it without <br />participating." ' . <br /> <br />Mr. Breitenstein: "Glerm, what will Colorado get 01lt of it?" <br /> <br />. Mr. Saunders: "Nothing. Those who want. a CO!Jlpact can go ahead and compact <br />without Colorado." <br /> <br />Mr. Dille: "I don 't think we have any concern at all." <br /> <br />Mr. Christy: "We want to remain neutral', but not oppose." <br /> <br />Mr. !3reitenstein: ''''Just say we want 'out." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.