Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />--'--'-- <br />SAN JUAN <br /> <br />AlliANCE <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />850 Main Avenue <br />PO Box 2461 <br /> <br />Durango, CO <br />81302 <br /> <br />.910.259.3583 <br />, 10.259.8303 <br /> <br />~v\ <br /> <br />RI!C/:/JIIEO <br />~o"'iIo /006 <br />W,:Ue-c <br />' L'i/' <br />~/v;.o,.O <br />"'n~ <br /> <br />January 16,2006 <br /> <br />Mr. Dan Merriman <br />Instream Flow Program <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, # 721 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />Dear Dan: <br />The San Juan Citizens Alliance would like to support the instream flow <br />recommendations made by the staff of the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board and the Bureau of Land Management for Yellow Jacket Creek. The <br />Alliance feels that this creek is an important part of the environment of <br />Canyons of the Ancients National Monument as well as an important part of <br />the recreational opportunities that the Monument affords visitors. We <br />recognize that the Monument is to be managed to protect and enhance the <br />natural environment. The riparian habitats that have been created by the <br />customary diversion of water and resulting return flows are just such an <br />enhancement. Habitat for native warmwater fish in Colorado is a shrinking <br />resource. Yellow Jacket Creek provides important habitat for two species of <br />native fish, the flannelmouth sucker and the bluehead sucker. This habitat is <br />an important resource of the Monument and efforts should be made to <br />preserve this resource even though it is an unintended consequence of trans- <br />basin diversion. It is fortunate that the State of Colorado has an instream flows <br />program to deal with opportunities of this nature. <br /> <br />The Alliance notes that substantial efforts have been made by the Board's <br />staff to discuss the proposed right with local water rights holders. It appears to <br />us that most questions have been resolved and we would encourage the Board <br />to look favorably on the current proposal or failing that to use its good offices <br />to arrive at agreement with those dependent on the waters in question for <br />historical uses. The proposed right to support instream flows deserves serious <br />consideration as a legitimate use of the waters in Yellow Jacket Creek. We <br />feel that the reservation of instream flows deserves the best efforts of all <br />parties to make room for Colorado water to be used to the best interest of the <br />full spectrum of uses for the citizens of the state. <br /> <br />The question of losing developable water to neighboring states is an important <br />question given the responsibilities of the Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br />The Alliance realizes that there is not a perfect solution which will prevent <br />every last acre foot of developable water from leaving the state in situations <br />where [SF rights are so close to state lines. We believe that when the people of <br />the state first created the instream flow program they gave the Board an <br />additional duty to include the use this tool to protect some of our waters for <br />instream purposes to protect and enhance the natural environment. This <br /> <br />www.sanjuancitizens.org <br />