My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02022
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:03 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:07:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/11/1959
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />oLuUU <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Glen Canyon but is only the period required <br />to accumulate 17,000,000 acre feet total <br />storage in Glen Canyon which is the full <br />power head at Glen Canyon. From there on <br />out the operation becomes something else. <br />In order to do that, certain assumed cri- <br />teria had to be established both for the <br />operation of Glen Canyon and for the opera- <br />tion at Hoover Dam. The criteria that was <br />used for Glen Canyon was first to meet <br />Article III (d) of the Colorado River Com- <br />pact which we assumed to be the release of <br />75,000,000 acre feet over any consecutive ten <br />year period. Then we would produce power at <br />Glen Canyon to meet the amortization require- <br />ment contained in the financial and economic <br />analysis published by the Bureau of Reclama- <br />tion in 1958. In that analysis, if you will <br />remember, they indicated the total power that <br />must be produced by the Upper Colorado River <br />Storage Project. The amount of power that had <br />to be produced by Glen Canyon then was arrived <br />at by a ratio of the power at Glen Canyon to <br />the other power units within the project and <br />from that we came out with an annual requirement <br />for pOWer to be produced at Glen Canyon to meet <br />the amortization schedule established for it <br />in that document. <br /> <br />Then we assumed that after the storage at <br />Glen Canyon reaches 7.2 million acre feet which <br />is the dead storage, that no. releases below 7.2 <br />million acre feet would be made under any cir- <br />cumstances after it had reached that point. Of <br />course, after that's closed, why then it would <br />not be possible to make releases below that. <br />After storage at Glen Canyon reaches 17 million <br />acre feet, we assumed that we would not draw <br />below 17 million except to meet Article III (d) <br />of the Compact, whatever that might be for any <br />particular year. <br /> <br />These were conducted under one hydro- <br />logic cycle, 1922-l957, then we equated <br />within that cycle 1922-1962 as a period <br />when the flows were good initially; 1930- <br />1962 was a period when the initial flows <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.