Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />DR. ROBERTS: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />13b'/ <br /> <br />forthcoming funds that have been referred <br />to in this weather modification act, which, <br />by the way, for the record, is Senate Bill <br />No. 943, to parallel the House Bill." <br /> <br />"I think it's only fair to say that we <br />would be doing research that could be used <br />by other states, and in fact, by the entire <br />nation, but in turn we would be building that <br />research on the basis of things that have been <br />done elsewhere whose benefits we would be in- <br />corporating into our work. I think, at least <br />from my side, it would be dishonest to say <br />that the things that we obtain here would <br />not be immediately applicable in other areas. <br /> <br />That's just part of the basic nature of <br />scientific research. If you do something <br />and publish it, it becomes of benefit to any- <br />body who chooses to pick it up." <br /> <br />"Are there any other questions from the <br />members of the Board? How about our guests <br />at the meeting today - does anyone have any <br />questions they would like to address to these <br />gentlemen? Larry, do you have some comments <br />you would like to make?" <br /> <br />"Possibly the one thing I think Mr. Miller <br />mentioned about the studies of the Bureau of <br />Reclamation. All the studies that either the <br />Bureau does or that our staff does in connec- <br />tion with water supply, future water supply <br />for any project, is based upon past stream <br />flow. Now we all realize that that method <br />is completely inadequate because we have not <br />the faintest idea that the stream flow, we'll <br />say, for the past twenty years is going to <br />equal the stream flow for the next twenty. <br />We are merely taking past history and assuming <br />that that condition will repeat itself within <br />the next period of years that the past history <br />concerned. <br /> <br />That, to date, is the only method we have <br />of projecting water supply availability for <br />projects which we are now constructing or which <br />we will construct in the future. As I stated, <br />that is an extremely poor method. It is really <br />not based upon scientific evidence of any type. <br />It is merely based upon what has happened, and <br />there is not too much probability that condi- <br />tions which existed within the past twenty years <br />