BOARD01987

• Board Meeting Date: 7/13/1998
• Description: CF Section - Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Company - Horseshoe #2 Reservoir Outlet Rehabilitation
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Memo

Horseshoe Outlet Works Rehabilitation Study
Plan of Study ,
Page 2

,

.

Task 1 - Data Collection
Objective:
A thorough knowledge of previous studies will be augmented with published physical infonnation,
environmental and water rights issues. The published physical infonnation will include construction drawings
of the existing facilities.
Methodology:
I. Available water rights infonnation from the Company will be reviewed and tabulated.
2. Existing two-foot contour maps will be obtained from the City of Loveland and the Company

Products:
I. A task memorandum will be prepared listing available project infonnation and stating Boyle's
understanding of existing facilities.

Task 2 - Alternative Development
Objective:
Several alternatives will be developed including structural and nonstructural elements in an attempt to identify
the least costly combination of measures for achieving the study objective.

Methodology:
I. Identify structural and non-structural plan elements.
2. Preliminary evaluate plan elements to detennine which are suitable for further analysis. .
3. Fonnulate alternatives using those plan elements, which are carried forward from the first two steps.

Products:
I. A memorandum will be prepared describing the methods used in fonnulating alternatives from the
plan elements. The fonnulated alternatives will be used in Task 4 Alternative Evaluation.

Task 3 - Alternative Evaluation
Objective:
The alternatives identified in Task 2 must be evaluated to distinguish the differences between them and to
fonnulate up to three sound system alternatives.

Methodology:
I. The plan elements will be fonnulated into system alternatives. The six evaluation factors used by the
CWCB will be used which include the following:
a. Description of project outputs or yieids;
b. Project costs including capital costs, annual costs and cost per unit of output;
c. Impacts on the man-made environment, the natural environment, and existing social structure;
d. The financial feasibility of the proposed project as measured by the project sponsor's ability
to repay all reimbursable costs;
e. Institutional requirements for project implementation; and
f. Any special technical problems which should be taken into consideration during the study.

D:\PROJECTSIHORSESHOEIHORSEPOS.DOC

.

-