Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />some specific, positive suggestions for improving the procedures of <br />this system, that yeu make those. I don't think at these meetings is <br />the appropriate time to try to. get into those kinds ef questions, but <br />I think it's certainly an appropriate thing to do, try to. do between <br />meetings, so. that we can censtant1y review where we're geing and how <br />we're improving our pregram. I think that's what I was getting to <br />earlier by my comment. I think it would make geod sense fer yeu to. sit <br />down with the divisions and go over how they're carrying out their werk. <br /> <br />MR. BROWNELL: The reason I'm so. insis,tent en thiswater,shed ,thil!l~, .j, <br />is that I know darn well if we don't get Het Creek in en La Jara Creek, <br />we're going threugh this hassle again when Het Creek cemes up. I <br />weuld just as seen get the hassle all ever with in ene lump. Hence- <br />ferth, I think it eught to. be done in these little watersheds, that we <br />need to. have all the creeks, so it won't come up again and we have <br />anether hassle with it. <br /> <br />MR. WEILER: I'm Bill Weiler with the Divisien ef Wildlife in Montrose. <br />I agree with you, sir, except that the Divisien of Wildlife already <br />has a decree en Hot Creek. <br /> <br />MR. BROWNELL: I know that. They own it, the whole deal. <br /> <br />MR. KOCHMAN: Yeur point is well taken. I think we can come into the <br />board and we'll try, and when we come in with a recommendatien -- I'm <br />not geing to. say that we're not going to. miss some streams. There <br />are streams in that one hundred eighty-six that I mentiened that it's <br />geing to. take a helicepter to. get into., some in the Wilderness area, <br />and I think there will have to be some discretien on being one hundred <br />percent complete, but we're going to. try. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: I think we've spent sufficient time en this. <br /> <br />MR. ADKINS: Mr. Chairman, in light ef the actien that yeu have taken <br />on Ricardo and since, as I understand the purpose fer the existence ef <br />the Celorade Water Conservatien Beard is pretectien and develepment ef <br />the waters of the state ef Ce1erade, may I assume at this peint that <br />we can expect the full support ef the Board and the other agencies of <br />the state in prosecuting eur conditiena1 decree which we have en Ricardo. <br />to. its development so. that we can stabilize and expand the economy ef <br />that area ef the state? <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: Your decree is senior to any decree we'll have. Therefore, <br />yeur decree is net affected by the junier decree that we may get. <br /> <br />MR. ADKINS: I'm speaking about the situatien as it exists and the preb- <br />lem that we have. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: If yeu're asking us to commit the Governer and the Attorney <br />General to the support ef a legal action in which CFI is engaged, <br />you've come to the wrong place. I can't make that commitment and <br />neither can this beard. <br /> <br />-55- <br />