Laserfiche WebLink
<br />only centroversy is whether we cut iE eff at Capulin or at the diversien <br />structure', but we do have a treut fishery, and a pretty goed one. I. <br />thought that we satisfied the beard's directien very well. My recom- <br />mendatien to the beard would be to at least censider La Garita, Embargo, <br />Beriino ana Groundhog, and we'll talk sOme mere on La Jara. ' <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: . Mi. Kochman, we're not geing to lose any greund by post~ I <br />poning it unti1,September. We'll still come up with a 1976 date, <br />whether we~fi1e it now or september. :In view of what the beard,member <br />said and his understanding with the people in his area, I 'think we <br />would~beout of order not to consider his recemmendatien. <br /> <br />The point yeu make about the other streams is well taken. We have at. <br />least twelve thousand miles of streams to survey under this act. It <br />will take us ten to fifteen years at~least to. get that dene. We can!t <br />wait until the data is accumulated on all of them. There are ether <br />areas down t4ere that we have to. file minimun stream flows on also, but <br />we simply don't have the'data available at this time. What we're trying <br />to do is loek at the most impertant fisheries first in the.state, and <br />then ,we'll follow up-on the rest later., We just can't get to.' all of ' <br />them at .once. " - . <br /> <br />MR. SHERMAN: Mr. Chairman, I weuld suggest: that we. defer.on this"one <br />item until September so that Mr. Brownell and the people of his area . <br />can get together. I would certainly hope-in September that this board <br />can take action en this particular recommendation. I will put that in <br />a motion.: '- '" : <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER:;. IS there a secend? <br /> <br />MR. VANDEMOER: I'll second it. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: So. that we know 'what we I re talking; ,about , the motion <br />includes the postponement of La Garita,Groundheg, Benine;~Embarge, and <br />La Jara Creeks. -" <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: The motion is that this,be:restpened until September, is <br />that right? <br /> <br />MR. SHERMAN: Yes, but that prior to Sept,ember the staff and Mr. Brownell <br />and the peep1e down there get together and resolve these things or at <br />least discuss them so we know where we're' in agreement and:where we'~e <br />not. - <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Is there any mere discussion of that motien, that action? <br />All in favor of that motion say aye. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />THE BOARD: Aye. , <br />MR.' KROEGER: "Opposed, no.. <br />THE BOARD: (No. response.) <br />MR. KROEGER: That still leaves us the balance of the greup. I had a <br /> <br />~44- <br />