My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01955
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:05:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/21/1973
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the federal funding aspect goes of those five western Colorado proj- <br />ects should be funded so that tney deliver water simultaneously with <br />the Central Arizona Project. As far as the five projects are con- <br />cerned and this board is concerned, the five projects should have <br />funding requested simultaneously. The actual funding by the United <br />StatES Congress may be out of the hands of these gentlemen, the Governor I <br />and the director. I would like to request that their funding be <br />requested simultaneously. <br /> <br />I think that we should try to point out to our congressional delegation <br />the history. We should also, I think, try to point out to the con- <br />gressional delegation the importance of the western slope projects. <br />I think that we should recognize that the projects may not be built <br />as originally envisioned by the Bureau of Reclamation or the Colorado <br />River Water Conservation District. I believe that if you start at the <br />Basa~t project or the Silt project or the West Divide project today <br />by the time they were constructed they would not be the project as <br />now on the drawing board. The use of water is changing. <br /> <br />As regards oil shale in relationship to water resources from Colorado <br />.and the White River basins. we should try to get to somebody who <br />understands how much water is going to be needed. The United States <br />today is adjudicating in the state courts today. They have not yet <br />withdrawn the claims for 200,000 acre-feet of Colorado River water <br />>with a 19l6 date. <br /> <br />So I do think this, Mr. Chairman, that the whole problem that we are <br />discussing here today is probably a microcosm of a much larger prob- <br />lem. If I were going back to Washington or if I would have any input <br />to what Felix and the Governor are going to do, I think I would try <br />to handle this short-term problem in as intensive a manner as I could <br />and try to influence the Administration and the Congress in a postive <br />way to fund the study and construction of these projects. In the <br />long-term, we are looking at a long-term problem and we lost a great <br />deal of our influence when we lost Wayne Aspinall and Senator Allott. <br />.And toward the point of the long-term problem, I think that the state <br />of Colorado and perhaps the four Upper Basin states should as soon <br />as possible, and we should have started about ten years ago, begin a <br />very deep and comprehensive liaison in Washington, D. C. Felix and <br />I talked about it. I talked about it with the state engineer. I <br />talked about it with Ival Goslin. I talked about it with represen- <br />tatives of the other three Upper Basin states. I think that what we <br />are addressing ourselves here today is a short-term aspect of a very <br />long-range problem. I think that maybe the handwriting was on the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-77- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.