Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />the alternatives - recreation, agriculture, industry and minerals - <br />and we must develop all of these. The San Miguel project is the most <br />important tool that we need to get this job done. Without the San <br />Miguel project, we will continue to be at the mercy of the "boom and <br />bust" of mining and subjected to the highly speculative nature of a <br />recreation economy. However, with the San Miguel project we can <br />stabilize our economy and provide for a steady, healthy growth for <br />the future. <br /> <br />We cannot overemphasize the importance of the fact that the five Colo- <br />rado projects are to be constructed concurrently with the Central <br />Arizona project. Gentlemen, this is the law of the land. Until some- <br />one changes it, it is the strongest argument that the state of Colo- <br />rado has for developing its share of the Colorado River. We strongly <br />disagree with anyone who tries to "soft pedal" or de-emphasize the <br />importance of the concurrent provisions of Section SOl(b} of the <br />Colorado River Basin Project Act (Public Law 9-537, September 30, <br />1968). <br /> <br />The question that I ask each and every member of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board is "What happens to Colorado's share of the Colo- <br />rado River if we do not build the five Colorado projects?" To us, <br />the answer is perfectly clear. If we do not build these projects, <br />the water will either go down the river or through the Continental <br />Divide to the Front Range corridor. <br /> <br />As far as the state of Colorado is concerned, we believe that it would <br />be in the state's best interest to do everyting it can to keep more <br />people from "stacking up" in one narrow con:idor of land between Fort <br />Collins and Pueblo. It would be cheaper and much more desirable to <br />disperse the population evenly throughout the state. However, unless <br />something is done, there will be a continual migration of people to <br />the Front Range corridor. Historically, water has gone to the people: <br />however, we believe that if we can tie this water down and develop it <br />locally in the San Miguel basin by building the San Miguel project, <br />we can provide and economic base for attracting some of the people <br />away from this continual migration into the big cities. <br /> <br />In view of the current worldwide energy crisis, we believe that every <br />possibility should be explored for developing energy resources. In <br />the San Miguel basin, we have the following potential energy resources: <br />(l) Fossil fuels, (2) nuclear fuels, and (3) water power. Nuclear <br />energy is of special importance since the recent proposed release of <br />Atomic Energy Commission reserves of uranium ores in the San Miguel <br /> <br />-60- <br />