Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Arkansas Valley Conduit Study Update: The feasibility study for the Arkansas Valley Conduit is <br />nearing completion and a draft final report is being prepared, The draft Feasibility Study conclusions <br />and recommendations were recently presented at a series of three public meetings in Pueblo (Oct. <br />23), La Junta (Oct. 29) and Lamar (Oct. 30). <br /> <br />The reconnaissance-level evaluations performed in Phase 1 did not identify any apparent technical or <br />environmental fatal flaws that would prohibit the implementation of the pipeline, <br /> <br />Key conclusions of the Phase 2 feasibility-level study are: <br /> <br />1) The pipeline should transport "raw" water, as opposed to treated water, to local water users <br />for treatment; <br /> <br />2) A gravity aligmnent (no pumping required) is preferred, following the Bessemer Ditch <br />through Pueblo, paralleling the south side of Hwy, 50 to Fowler, crossing to the north side of <br />Hwy. 50 and the Arkansas River, and following an easterly aligmnent to the City of Lamar <br />($175 million construction cost); <br /> <br />3) The estimated net present value of the pipeline project, induding construction, and 0 & M <br />costs is $235 million. The net present value ofthe no-action alternative is $187 million. The <br />no-action costs are likely to escalate because of new drinking water regulations and <br />considering the overall health and standard ofliving benefits from a reliable high quality <br />surface water supply; <br /> <br />4) The financing capability of the counties, cities, and water agencies in the project area is <br />approximately 25% of the project cost. (It is possible that CWCB could be approached for as <br />much as a $25 million loan over a several year period); and, <br /> <br />5) The two likely institutional frameworks to construct, operate and maintain the pipe line are <br />either a Water Authority or a Water Conservancy District. <br /> <br />Senator Allard and Representative Schaeffer have both introduced bills to arnend the original <br />1962 Fry-Ark legislation to authorize federal funding for 75 percent of the pipeline cost. <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin Issues <br /> <br />Eagle River NRD funding: We have been working with the Town of Minturn on a funding request <br />from the Eagle Mine Natural Resource Damage Fund. Minturn's proposal seeks to place a deed <br />restriction on 500 acre-feet of Eagle Park Reservoir water so that the water would have to be used in <br />the Eagle River watershed downstream of Dowds Junction, The proposal contemplates donating this <br />interest in water to the Board for protection as an instream flow between the outlet ofthe Eagle Park <br />Reservoir and Dowds Junction, <br /> <br />Griles Announces Water Source for San Luis Rey Tribes: On Oct. 15 Deputy Secretary of the <br />Interior Steven Griles joined representatives of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern <br />California, the San Luis Rey Indian Water Authority, the City ofEscondido and the Vista Irrigation <br />District in signing Principles of Agreement for the San Luis Rey Indian Water Settlement Act. <br /> <br />Under the California 4.4 plan, the Secretary of the Interior is working with the Tribes, the State of <br />California and local water districts to execute a number of required agreements. The agreement to <br />implement the San Luis Rey Water Settlement Act, and the securing of water for these Tribes, is one <br />of those important agreements. <br /> <br />10 <br />