Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />designation was made. This will be a continuing problem. There is <br />nothing static about flood hazard areas. They will change from time <br />to time as conditions change. For instance, the continuing upstream <br />development here in the metropolitan area. greater amounts of housing. <br />paved roads, and what have you, accelerates floodwater at a greater <br />rate downstream. In every case where we have requested a change, one <br />of them is in Colorado Springs and two in Lakewood, is because of <br />changed conditions. New studies have been made and these resolutions <br />recognize the effect of those changes. As far as we know, there is no <br />controversy associated with any of these six resolutions. In each case, <br />the local authority has requested that we take action on them. <br /> <br />Mr. Stapleton: Is there any objection to considering all of them at <br />one time? All right, they are in your folder. The first one is the <br />city of Durango, Animas River and tributaries, the next one is the <br />city of Aspen, the Roaring Fork River; the next one is the Weir Gulch; <br />the next one is Sanderson Gulch; the next one is Sand and West Sand <br />Creeks. E1 Paso County; and the last one is Wolf Creek, Granada. Colo- <br />rado. <br /> <br />I will entertain a motion that they all be approved. (See Appendices B. <br />C, D. E. F and G.) <br /> <br />Mr. Geissinger: I so move. <br />Mr. Vandemoer: I second it. <br /> <br />Is there any <br />opposed. <br /> <br />Mr. Statleton: It has been regularly moved and seconded. <br />discuss on'l All those in favor signify by saying "aye" - <br />"no." They are approved unanimously. <br /> <br />We are now going to agenda item number 5, final consideration of model <br />floodplain regulation. I notice that we have some new members of the <br />audience. If you intend to participate in the discussion. will you <br />please leave your name immediately so that we can recognize you. And <br />again, if you have a time limitation, just register up here with Mary <br />Martel at the front of the room. We will try to comply with your time <br />limitations. <br /> <br />Now just so we can get the record in order. We have had a good number <br />of comments from various people and entities and we will make these a <br />part of the file. not a part of the minutes of the meeting. The file <br />will reflect the correspondence that we have had so that when you read <br />the minutes will know that these are part of the file. A letter from <br />Roger H. Olson, 1747 Sunset Boulevard, Boulder, dated November 7, 1974; <br />a letter from Vranesh & Musick. Attorneys, Boulder, Colorado. dated <br />November 6, 1974; a letter from the Urban Drainage and Flood Control <br />District. dated November 7; a letter dated November 20 from the Larimer <br />County Planning Commission; a letter from the Flatirons Companies, <br />dated November 19; a letter from the city of Englewood, dated Nov~ <br />ember 20; a letter from Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers. Inc.. <br />dated November 19; a letter from the Colorado Open Space Council, Inc., <br />dated November 6; a letter from the Chamber of Commerce of Boulder. <br />dated November 13, 1974; a letter from the Center Environmental Clearing <br /> <br />- - <br /> <br />-44- <br />