My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01897
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01897
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:32 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/10/1998
Description
CF Section - Groundwater Appropriators of the South Platte - Approval of a Construction Fund Authorization in Amount of $1.7 M for Construction of the Sedgwick Augmentation Reservoir
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,e <br /> <br />; . <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />· The pumping water level in the wells does not drop below 30' from the surface elevation <br />of the wells. Based on field pump testS from Canfield Drilling, <br />· A 24" High Density Polyethylene (HOPE) or equivalent (c= 140) pipeline delivers the <br />water to the reservoir site, The sizing needs to be large enough to keep the overall total <br />dynamic head below 85 feet. <br />. The reservoir normal high water surfaCe elevation is below 3,570' msl. <br /> <br />The wells will require the construction of a manifold and pipeline delivery system to be used for this <br />project, Additional studies at the preliminary level should be done to determine if phasing the project <br />with later construction of this connection would work technically as well as economically, This well <br />system does offer one alternate to fill the fmal 500 acre-feet of storage in the reservoir once gravity <br />diversions from the Peterson Ditch are no longer feasible, <br /> <br />A second alternate for topping off the reservoir would be to install a new pumping station at the <br />proposed Peterson release structure. These pumps would be low head and have a shorter pumping <br />distance to the reservoir. This alternate should be explored further at the preliminary design stage to <br />determine the flexibility that a forebay/pumping plant would bring at this location, Figure 2 <br />illustrates the locations of the possible water supply sources in regards to the proposed reservoir site. <br /> <br />The delivery of water to the proposed reservoir can be accomplished through the combined use of the <br />Peterson Ditch and the either the "Ovid Wells" or a pumping plant on the Peterson Ditch. Gravity <br />diversions from the Peterson Ditch will be capable of filling approximately 1,700 acre-feet of the <br />2,230 acre-feet of total capacity, or roughly 75%. <br /> <br />The "Ovid Wells" are capable of supplying water to the reservoir for topping it off, but the operation <br />of the wells will be more costly than the diversions from the Peterson Ditch. A preliminary cost <br />estimate, based on current power costs, indicate the pumping costs associated with using the "Ovid <br />Wells" to fill the reservoir would cost approximately $7.50/acre-ft. <br /> <br />C Water Deliveries to the South Platte River <br />The reservoir would release water to the South Platte River through two methods, The first option <br />would be an existing open channel running from the Southeast comer of the reservoir, following the <br />existing drainage slough back to the river, The second option would be accomplished by reversing <br />the flow in the pumping pipeline from the GASP Ovid wells and allowing water to flow by gravity <br />back to the river. <br /> <br />The present capacity of the open channel and slousJI back to the river may not allow for all releases <br />to go back to the river. There is a culvert through the railroad that is probably under capacity. There <br />would also be some channel grading improvements that would be required if the Ovid Well pipeline <br />manifold was not constructed, There is adequate property to construct these improvements and it is <br />technically feasible, The sizing will depend on final operational decisions made at the preliminary <br />design phase. <br /> <br />The release structure for the reservoir will be sized between a 50 to 60 cfs maximum capacity. This <br />capacity was modeled with daily gage flow records at Julesberg. Some simplistic assumptions were <br />made in the modeling with regard to flows available for diversion, It allowed the 2,000 acre-foot <br />reservoir to actually regulate an average annual diversion ranging between 1,800 to 2,400 acre-feet <br />depending on assumed operating conditions, This was based on an all or nothing approach to <br />releases. If the release capacity from the reservoir was not adequate to bring flows up to 120 cfs, <br />then the reservoir was not operated. This approach could supplement flows at the State line on up to <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.