My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01858
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01858
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:08 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:03:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1967
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:'::S~b <br /> <br />Representative Tom Neal from Durango. <br />Glad to have you with us." <br /> <br />REPRESENTATIVE NEAL: <br /> <br />"Thank you." <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />"I don't think there are any other mem- <br />bers of the legislature here. Former Repre- <br />sentative Woolf from Boulder is here as a <br />private citizen now, smiling." <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />MR. rlOOLF: <br /> <br />"Thank you." <br /> <br />MR. CORNELIUS: <br /> <br />"Mr. Chairman, may I ask the Attorney a <br />question?" <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />"Yes. Mr. Cornelius." <br /> <br />MR. CORNELIUS: <br /> <br />"In the event the Supreme Court does <br />appoint a referee or a master, this will not <br />necessarily be a river master, will he?" <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br /> <br />"I will be glad to clarify that. There <br />are two kinds of special masters which the <br />Supreme Court might appoint. One is the kind <br />of a special master which was appointed in <br />the case between Texas and New Mexico in <br />1951, which was dismissed but it still took <br />five years for that procedure; it never went <br />to trial. The master there did take evidence <br />as to whether or not the United States was <br />an indispensable party and we have asked the <br />court in our brief that if the court has any <br />question abont \~hether the United States is <br />an indispensable party, that it follow this <br />practice and appoint a master to take such <br />evidence as may be necessary. <br /> <br />The court also has the authority to <br />appoint a water master which is in the nature <br />of a gold-plated'water :commissioner. He has ,'I <br />the power and dignity of the United States <br />Supreme Court behind him but he actually runs <br />the river and Texas and New Mexico have asked <br />for the appointment of such a water master. <br />But I would anticipate that that is some dis- <br />tance down the road and it is entirely <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.