My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01858
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01858
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:08 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:03:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/12/1967
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />GOVERNOR JOHNSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />:>.;Itl~ <br /> <br />to 2 million acre-feet. This Meant that in <br />1965 then, if we had had a bad year, the <br />water year ending in '65, our reservoirs <br />would have been dry. Fortunately the water <br />year ending in 1965 was above average as <br />you can see. It pulled us out of the hole <br />and we. were able then to capture a reason- <br />able amount again in Glen Canyon. <br /> <br />be. <br />will <br /> <br />No one knows what the future flow may <br />Anything over 14 million in the future <br />be to our benefit." <br /> <br />"Now as I understand the situation on <br />this agenda item, at our last meeting we <br />approved the redraft of the Basin project <br />bill, with the exception of Title VI, and <br />we held over until this meeting a considera- <br />tion of Title VI. So I believe it would now <br />be in order to have a motion to approve the <br />Basin Project bill with Title VI as amended <br />in the draft of December 30, 1966, and as <br />approved by the Advisory Committee yesterday. <br />I would think that the motion should state <br />in definite terms that it is the policy of <br />the state of Colorado from which there will <br />be no deviation and that these then would <br />be the instructions that Mr. Sparks and the <br />members of the Board would have in negotiat- <br />ing with the other states and in their pre- <br />sentation to the Congress. Is that a fair <br />statement of the situation?" <br /> <br />"May I ask a question, Mr. Chairman?" <br /> <br />"Yes, sir.1I <br /> <br />"When you state against deviation, you. <br />are not including, of course, action by the <br />congress? That only refers to the states of <br />the Colorado River Basin?" <br /> <br />"This refers only to the position of the <br />State of Colorado as exemplified by this <br />staff and this Board. I think this has to <br />be a firm and a definite position that we <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.