Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />August 1998. The proposal calls for a scaled-down project that would sati~fy the senior water rights of <br />the Southern Ute and Ute Mountain tribes, while providing some M&l water for Durango and <br />Farmington. The DSEIS also includes an analysis of a "non-structural alternative" that has been proposed <br />by some organizations. The DSEIS was prepared because of a change in project size suggested by the <br />Clinton Administration and was prepared by Reclamation with the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe as a co-lead <br />pursuant to the Tribe's right to assume certain agency responsibilities under the Indian Self-Determination <br />Act. A record of Decision is expected in June. <br /> <br />The DSEIS is now open for a 60-day public review period; written comments will be accepted <br />until March 17, 2000 and public hearings will be held: <br /> <br />. Durango - February 15,2000,7:00 - 9:00 p.m., DoubleTree Hotel, 501 Camino Del Rio; <br /> <br />. Farmington- February 16,2000,7:00 - 9:00 p.m., Farmington Civic Center, 200 West Arrington; <br /> <br />. Denver- February 17,2000,7:00 - 9:00 p.m., Denver Convention Center, 700 14th Street. <br /> <br />Written comments should be addressed to Pat Schumacher, Four Corners Division Manager, Four <br />Corners Division of the Western Area Office, 835 East Second Avenue, Suite 300, Durango, Colorado <br />81301-5475; telephone (970) 385-6590; faxogram (970) 385-6539; E-mail pschumacher@uc.usbr.gov. <br />The document is available on the Internet at http://www.uc.usbr.gov under the Environmental Studies, <br />Summaries & Reports heading. <br /> <br />Navajo Dam Re-operation EIS: Re-operation of Navajo Dam to meet the San Juan Recovery <br />Program flow recommendations is critical to both the recovery program and our ability to move forward <br />with the Animas-La Plata Project. The final flow recommendations are contained in a May, 1999 report. .. <br />The EIS will evaluate the impacts ofre-operating Navajo Dam to meet those flow recommendations. ., <br />Attached is a newsletter that gives a good overview of the issues the EIS will need to address and the <br />study schedule. We sent a letter to Reclamation on December 14 identifying issues that need to be <br />addressed in the EIS. <br /> <br />-~ <br /> <br />Yampa and White River Basin <br /> <br />Yampa Water Management Planning: The process of assisting the USWS in the preparation of <br />a Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Yampa River basin is continuing. The opinion would evaluate <br />the Upper Colorado Endangered Fish Recovery Program's ability to ensure fish recovery while water <br />development continues in the basin. <br /> <br />On December 8, a draft Yampa Management Plan prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />was reviewed. The plan includes a discussion of legal mandates, historic and new depletions that will be <br />covered by the plan (at least 120 KAF of existing depletions, plus 50 KAFto meet expected new demands <br />by the 2045); non-native fish control issues; fish passage issues; specific recovery actions designed to <br />offset depletion impacts; possible sources of augmentation water to fish habitat needs; and, monitoring to <br />evaluate progress. <br /> <br />A meeting of water users was held in Craig on January 12 to discuss modeling issues associated <br />with the release of the Yampa plan. Water users want to know if3,300 AF of water is enough to satisfy <br />USFWS flow needs. Water users also want to know who may be included in the 50 KAF of new .. <br />depletions and more specifically, that uses in Wyoming are not included, because they are covered by a ., <br /> <br />12 <br />