My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01845
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:07:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:03:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/14/1954
Description
Table of Contents, Minutes and Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />J". <br /> <br />Mt-. Crawford: "I have a letter from Senator Johnson". <br /> <br />UNITED STATES SENATE <br /> <br />December 31, 1953 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Honorable Ivan C. CraNford <br />Director <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Denver, Colorado <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Crawford: <br /> <br />Thank you for your letter of December 21st in which you <br />furnish additional information pertaining to the Curecanti <br />Project. ...... <br /> <br />. I am bitterly disappointed at the proposal of Secretary <br />IkKay for the Upper Colorado River Basin. The inclusion <br />of Glen Canyon and the exclusion of the Cross Mountain <br />Project cannot be justified. Colorado furnishes over <br />72 percent of all the water in the Colorado River Basin <br />and under the Department of Interior's proposal, would <br />lose a maj or portion of the benefits of this water. The <br />Interior Department's proposal to include Glen Canyon and . <br />other projects at the expense of Colorado will compel me <br />to fight it to the last ditch. <br /> <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />The Cross Mountain Project could be built to store over <br />5,ooc,000 acre feet of water. This in turn would enable <br />the Upper Basin States to more easily fulfill their com- <br />mitment for delivery of water to the Lower Basin States. <br /> <br />It can be constructed much quicker than Glen Canyon and <br />would contribute substantially to the complete develop- <br />ment of the Upper Colorado River and also start to pay <br />back more quickly the cost of the project. <br /> <br />. . . . . ... . . . . . . . <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ECJ:ES <br />enclosure. <br /> <br />/s/ Ed C. Johnson <br /> <br />Mr. Crawford: "The next item'from this office is the question of' <br />printing more University of Colorado reports. We have ordered 500 <br />and of those 500, 250 were delivered yesterday. The report costs <br />$2.00 per copy, for the first 500. ~ suggestion is that another <br />500 be oroered, as we expect there will be a continued demand. Sug_. <br />gestions from this Board would be welcome. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.