My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01842
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:07:57 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:03:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Description
WSP Section - San Juan Recovery Program - Revised Program Document
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Program issues. The Program Director should have adequate funds to obtain <br />external contract support in conducting this effort." <br /> <br />. Providing progress reports and prioritized budget requirements to the Coordination <br />Committee for review and approval. <br /> <br />The change is recommended to place the administrati....c responsibility for progress reports and <br />budgeting under the auspices of the Program Coordinator, whose role is to provide the <br />administrative functions for the Program. <br /> <br />Biology Committee <br /> <br />Chanqe Number 13: <br /> <br />The Suh-committee that believes that the wording governing committee member qualifications <br />recommends is too restrictive and recommends the following replacement wording: "Because the <br />efforts of the Biology Committee relate specifically to the scientific basis for recovery. each <br />participant on the committee will have expertise that is generally applicable to the San Juan <br />River or its native fish fauna." <br /> <br />Biology Committee <br /> <br />Chanqe Number 14: <br /> <br />The Sub-committee that believes that the process governing selection of technical committee <br />representatives is too restrictive and recommends the following process: <br /> <br />"Each of the participants may appoint one representative to the committee (multiple <br />representatives representing a single participant will share the single vote allotted to that <br />participant). Each participant will determine the qualifications of its representative on the <br />Biology Committee. The representatives on the Biology Committee must bring to the Program a <br />cooperative and objective analysis of the river's habitats and fish community." <br /> <br />Chapter 6 - Procedures and Organization <br />H~'drology Comminee <br /> <br />Chanqe Number 15: <br /> <br />The Sub-committee recommends the edits to the Hydrology Committee section shown in <br />Attachment 7. Attachment 7 includes the 1995 and proposed 2005 versions of this chapter along <br />with a redlinclstrike out version of the proposed edits and changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.