My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01820
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:07:43 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:03:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
4/14/1965
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. BARKLEY: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. BARKLEY: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />down to some difference of theory in water <br />usage at this point. If the United States <br />makes use of the water through the generators <br />at Green Mountain, this is beneficial use <br />under Colorado law, and it goes back to the <br />supreme subject of appropriation by others <br />after its return to the stream. While we <br />have some reservations about the Justice De- <br />partment's theory that the united states <br />retains dominion and control over the water <br />and can generate both power and also resell <br />the water downstream for second usage, we <br />have no reason to make any comment other than <br />to state it for the sake of the record and <br />bring it to your attention." <br /> <br />"Mr. Barkley, didn't we have a request <br />from the City of Fort Collins a while back <br />to use Adams Tunnel for some use (I don't <br />recall the details) and the Board took no <br />action?" <br /> <br />"Yes, that is correct, Mr. Chairman." <br /> <br />"I just wondered whether we were being <br />inconsistent here in taking some action and <br />not taking the same position on Fort Collins. <br />I don't remember the details." <br /> <br />"No, I think not. I think the character- <br />istics within these two questions, Mr. Staple- <br />ton, are quite different. The city of Fort <br />Collins had some apparent interest for a while <br />in the acquisition of some direct flow rights <br />on the western slope above Grand Lake and ex- <br />pressed a possibility of having the point of <br />diversion changed from Water District 51 to <br />Water District 3 in transporting such portion <br />of that right as might be allowed in a change <br />in point of diversion, character of use, suit <br />in Grand County, as to use by the City of <br />Fort Collins. The quantity of water, however, <br />was very small and in the complexities that <br />appeared to the city in the course of negotia- <br />tions for it, I think, at this point they have <br />abandoned the idea of doing anything. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.